Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Should paying for rape kits mean less money for victim services?

This forensic doctor in Texas might be getting paid out of victim compensation funds.
This forensic doctor in Texas might be getting paid out of victim compensation funds.
This forensic doctor in Texas might be getting paid out of victim compensation funds.
Max Faulkner/Fort Worth Star-Telegram/Getty

According to a new study from the Urban Institute, most states are taking money away from victim support services in order to provide free medical forensic exams (often called “rape kits”) to sexual-assault victims.

States are required to pay out-of-pocket costs for victims’ forensic exams in order to qualify for certain federal funds to fight violence against women. And the federal government is serious about this requirement: when some states started requiring victims to report their assaults to police before they’d be reimbursed for their rape kits, the federal government tweaked the law in 2005 to require states to cover the costs of all victims, whether they ended up reporting an assault to police or not.

Thirty-four states decided to pay for rape kits through their victim compensation funds: funds set up in every state to reimburse victims of crimes (of all types) for lost wages, medical and mental health care, and funeral costs. Some of these states only use the victim compensation fund to pay for rape kits in some cases (for example, if the victim doesn’t report the crime to police); nineteen states bill victim compensation funds for every exam they conduct.

Rape kits can eat up a large portion of the victim compensation fund’s budget. In Indiana, 78% of the state’s compensation fund went to rape exams in 2013 — no other state comes close to that, but several states do spend over 20%.

Screen_shot_2014-05-14_at_2.52.10_pm

States can argue that providing free medical exams counts as a service to victims — especially when those victims don’t end up reporting the crime to police. But they haven’t always allocated more money to victim compensation funds to cover the costs. The federal government is supposed to reimburse states for 60% of what victim funds spend on services, but over the past few years it’s been more like 20%. And the new federal requirements for states to pay for rape kits went into effect just as states got hit with a recession that led to more requests for victim services, and state budgetary crises that meant states had less money to give.

Several state officials told the Urban Institute that with all of these factors, there just isn’t room in their victim fund’s budget to cover the additional cost of rape kits without cutting something else. That means, the Urban Institute report concludes, that victim funds are being forced to choose between providing rape kits and providing other forms of support to victims. And since rape kits are federally mandated, other forms of support are inevitably getting cut.

Policy
Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?
Policy

The DOJ used to avoid spectacles like the Louise Lucas raid.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
What the Supreme Court still has left to decide this termWhat the Supreme Court still has left to decide this term
Politics

Democracy and Donald Trump dominate the Court’s remaining docket.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phoneThe Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone
Politics

The justices were concerned that the Trump administration is asking for too much in a major police surveillance case.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady