Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Wireless Carriers Offer Text-to-911 Service (But Is Anybody Listening?)

Only a handful of local public safety organizations have adopted the system so far.

Vjeran Pavic

The nation’s four largest wireless carriers have put in place the technology to allow customers to send text messages requesting help in emergencies.

For the moment, only a handful of places have emergency call centers equipped to receive such 911 text messages. California and Texas, the nation’s two most populous states, are not among them.

The Federal Communications Commission has pushed for text-to-911 service, saying it could be a life saver for the 42 million Americans who are hearing-impaired or have a speech disability.

Public safety officials say placing an emergency phone call is preferable.

Sometimes, though, texting may be the best way to get help, as when cellular networks are congested, or when placing a voice call would endanger the caller — as in the case of a shooting or domestic violence.

Brian Josef, assistant vice president of regulatory affairs for CTIA, the wireless industry’s trade organization, said the major wireless carriers — AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon — met the FCC’s May 15 voluntary deadline to put the text-to-911 technology in place.

But consumers won’t be able to send emergency text messages until local public safety organizations do their part to deploy the service.

Anyone who tries to text 911 in an area where service is unavailable will receive an automatic bounce-back, alerting them to place an emergency call.

The California Office of Crisis Communications did not respond to calls seeking comment.

Josef said short messaging was never designed for instantaneous, emergency communications. Sometimes messages can arrive hours (or even days) after they’re sent.

The service is viewed as an interim measure, put in place until a more robust, next-generation 911 service can be developed that could support messaging, photos and potentially even video.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh