Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

NimbleTV Wants to Sell You the TV Everywhere You’re Already Supposed to Have

Would you pay another $10 a month for that?

Getty Images/iStockphoto
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

If you pay for cable TV, would you pay more for a service that rounded up lots of the channels you’re already getting and let you watch them over the Web whenever you wanted to see them?

Anand Subramanian thinks you will. He says his NimbleTV startup will start selling a new service that gives pay-TV customers access to a Web-based DVR, which will let them watch a wide range of the channels they’re already getting at home on the go, whenever they want.

Unlike Aereo or other versions of Web TV, NimbleTV isn’t supposed to replace existing pay TV providers. Instead it is supposed to operate on top of them — and will be sold separately from them — for an additional charge of up to $10 a month.

Shorter version: Slingbox, without a box.

Nimble TV has already been selling a limited version of this product in New York City, but that version only gave customers extra access to broadcast channels like ABC and CBS. Now Subramanian is going to expand that to dozens of pay-TV channels and says he will expand into new markets this year, starting with Chicago in August.

All of this may cause some head-scratching for consumers, since many pay-TV channels, like ESPN or HBO, are already available on the go, over the Web, to most pay TV customers. But many programmers who have signed so-called “TV Everywhere” deals still have lots of limits about where and when their shows can be watched. Note this recent deal between Comcast and Turner, for instance, which only now provides mobile access to some of Turner’s shows.

NimbleTV may also cause teeth-gnashing and/or lawyer-hiring among pay-TV providers, who are laboriously trying to secure digital and mobile rights for the channels they distribute to TV sets. See, again, the Turner deal, and remember that Turner owner Time Warner is the company that has been pushing hardest for TV Everywhere — since 2009.

But Subramanian says he’s providing a useful service to customers, since they’ve already paid for the shows but can’t watch them at their convenience. And he says there shouldn’t be any legal issues with the pay-TV guys, since he’s not trying to displace the relationship they have with their customers.

“Our whole point is we’re selling a service to the consumer. The consumer has signed up and has the rights to this programming,” he says. “We’re just helping them watch it.”

I find it hard to believe that the TV Industrial Complex will be okay with this, but so far they haven’t shut him down in New York. I’ve asked Comcast*, which dominates the pay-TV market in Chicago, what it thinks of Subramanian’s plans, but the company declined to comment.

Nimble also sells the product it first started with — a service that lets people who aren’t in New York City get Web access to the TV they would be able to see if they lived there and subscribed to Dish Network’s satellite service. Just typing that sentence is convoluted, and it’s hard to see how there’s a lot of demand for that product, but Subramanian says he’ll keep selling it.

* Comcast owns NBCUniversal, which is a minority investor in Revere Digital, the parent company of Re/code.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh