Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

This App May Detect Skin Cancer Better Than Your Doc

The DermoScan tool may also detect a flesh-eating bacteria.

A smartphone app developed at the University of Houston can evaluate suspicious moles and lesions to determine whether they’re likely cancerous, possibly more accurately than some doctors.

The app is paired with a “dermoscope attachment,” a particular type of magnifying lens that costs around $500.

Initial testing found the DermoScan tool was accurate in spotting skin cancer roughly 85 percent of the time, on par with dermatologists and better than primary care physicians, according to a news release from the University on Tuesday.

Further testing is necessary, however. The possibility of providing false negatives would present real dangers for patients who might have otherwise sought further care. The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center is just getting started on a more thorough evaluation.

Meanwhile, the National Institutes of Health has provided a more than $400,000 grant to test the software and attachment’s ability to screen for Buruli ulcer, a flesh-eating bacteria affecting rural communities in sub-Saharan Africa.

George Zouridakis, a professor of engineering technology at the University of Houston, has been developing the computer vision technology since 2005.

The hope is the tool could provide initial screening in rural or developing areas that lack easy access to specialists. When the app determines high risks of cancer or infections, patients would be referred for follow-up evaluations.

It’s one of various emerging tools that piggyback on the computing power packed into smartphones for medical purposes, including CellScope’s otoscope for ear evaluations and the Peek system for eye exams.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh