Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Snapchat Settles FTC Charges on False Promises of Disappearing Messages

Snapchat agrees to 20 years of monitoring of new privacy program to prevent future issues.

Snapchat agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it deceived users into believing their messages would disappear when they were actually saved and could be accessed by others, the agency announced Thursday.

The FTC complaint alleged that “Snapchat’s failure to secure its Find Friends feature resulted in a security breach that enabled attackers to compile a database of 4.6 million Snapchat usernames and phone numbers.”

“If a company markets privacy and security as key selling points in pitching its service to consumers, it is critical that it keep those promises,” said FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez in a statement. “Any company that makes misrepresentations to consumers about its privacy and security practices risks FTC action.”

Last year, the Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a complaint to the FTC alleging that Snapchat’s promise of allowing users to share photos that would “disappear forever” wasn’t happening and the photos could still be viewed.

Under the terms of the FTC settlement, Snapchat will be prohibited from “misrepresenting the extent to which it maintains the privacy, security, or confidentiality of users’ information,” will be required to implement a new privacy program and will face independent monitoring for the next 20 years.

In a blog post, Snapchat said it had resolved most of the FTC’s concerns before entering into the consent decree by “improving the wording of our privacy policy, app description, and in-app just-in-time notifications.” The company acknowledged it has made mistakes in the past, noting that “while we were focused on building, some things didn’t get the attention they could have.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh