Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

AT&T’s Pitch to the Feds: Let Us Buy DirecTV, and Maybe TV Bills Won’t Go Up So Much

Our bills will go down. Yours will not.

iStock
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Remember when AT&T told investors that it could cut its programming bills by 20 percent if it buys DirecTV?

That was last week. This week, AT&T is telling regulators why they should let it buy DirecTV, and it’s making a similar argument. One difference: AT&T told investors its own bills would shrink. But it’s not saying that about the bills of its customers.

Instead, AT&T is telling the feds, via a public filing, that combining with DirecTV may help slow the rate that your TV bill goes up. But it can’t promise it will go down.

Instead it uses the words “downward pressure.” As in: “There will be significant downward pressure on the prices of the new integrated bundles of AT&T broadband and DIRECTV video, even without factoring in the improved quality such bundles will offer consumers.”

To be fair, AT&T argues that this pressure will come into effect without factoring in the 20 percent cost savings it told investors about. So it’s always possible that AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson could pass those savings along to his customers. But that’s a promise AT&T isn’t making.

One other note about pricing: AT&T’s summary of its filing also notes that there may be “upward pressure” on the prices of video or broadband services that aren’t bundled together. But it says if that’s the case it will be “significantly outweighed by the downward pressure [AT&T’s emphasis] on the prices of bundles of AT&T broadband and DIRECTV video that will now be available at improved quality and attractive prices.”

I’ve asked AT&T for clarification, but to me that reads as if the company is looking into the future and predicting a scenario where broadband prices for cord-cutters go up a lot faster than broadband prices for people who also buy pay TV from AT&T. And that AT&T is saying that’s no big deal, because people should just buy broadband and pay TV from AT&T, and stop worrying about it.

Which may very well be what the future holds. I’m just not sure I would say that out loud if I were Randall Stephenson.

Update: One alternate interpretation of AT&T’s upward/downward language — AT&T is trying to say that it will have incentive to sell standalone broadband at competitive prices, so that it could eventually upsell those customers into bundles that include video. But if that’s what they mean, it would be easier to just say that out loud.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady