Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Internet Security Firm Offers Free Protection to Political, Artistic Sites That Get Attacked

The Internet security firm launches a program to protect “politically and artistically important websites.”

Imfoto/Shutterstock

Three months ago, CloudFlare CEO Matthew Prince began his day poring over an operations team report on network incidents overnight when he noticed a Russian-language client had gone down under a denial-of-service attack.

The site only used CloudFlare’s free security product and was quickly overwhelmed, the report showed. After his team did a little digging, they discovered the site was one of the leading blogs covering the ongoing dispute between Russia and the Ukraine.

“I felt sick to my stomach,” Prince says. “We’d terminated protection for a customer that was doing something that was extremely politically important.”

On Thursday, Prince’s company is unveiling a new program to prevent that sort of thing from happening again. CloudFlare is launching a new free protection program, called Project Galileo, for sites which have been deemed by outside free speech groups to be “politically and artistically important.”

CloudFlare is a content delivery network, basically one of the Internet middlemen that helps sites speed up their traffic by routing it more efficiently or optimizing their content. The company also offers cyber security services to websites to help prevent denial of service or other malicious attacks. It has about two million customers.

The company says it will offer enterprise-level protection to the sites, which will be vetted by fifteen outside organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union, Freedom of the Press Foundation, Mozilla and Access, the global digital rights group.

The groups can nominate sites they think need protection or vet requests by nonprofits or other entities that meet the general guidelines for protection.

The company is trying to insulate itself from making any decisions about who gets protection, since it’s pretty likely that organizations that espouse unpopular views are going to be on the list.

If the Westboro Baptist Church, known for its demonstrations against the gay community, were on the list “we would protect them, even though I find their opinions disgusting,” Prince said.

“The solution to speech is more speech,” he said. “It is not our role to pick what speech is good speech and what speech is bad speech. We’ll do everything we can to keep that speech online even if someone is trying to shut it down.”

Recipients of the extra protection won’t be publicized, the company said, to avoid making them targets.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh