Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google Standing Down in DARPA Robotics Challenge

The finals will be held in California next summer, with more teams and harder tasks than previously planned.

Courtesy: DARPA

Schaft, an impressively dextrous little robot that earned the highest score in the DARPA Robotics Challenge trials in December, has left the competition after all.

Google acquired the team at the end of last year and reports emerged soon after that they’d withdraw from the $2 million competition, as first published on PopularScience.com. In March, DARPA shot down those concerns, announcing that the robot was sticking to the program, but switching into the self-funded track.

But in a call with reporters on Thursday, DARPA’s Gill Pratt said the team had officially elected to withdraw to “focus on their commercial product.”

That news came amid a general update on the Department of Defense robotics competition, which will now occur later, include more teams and involve more challenging tasks than previously planned.

The goal of the competition is to accelerate the development of robots that can aid in the aftermath of disasters, such as the Fukushima partial nuclear meltdown in 2011 or the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. It follows similar DARPA efforts to ignite investment and interest in other areas of robotics, notably the DARPA Grand Challenge for autonomous cars.

The finals are now scheduled for June 5 and 6, 2015, at the Fairplex in Pomona, Calif., about six months later than originally announced.

DARPA has pushed the event back and provided additional funding in part because it is increasing the complexity of the challenges the robots will face in the finals, largely because the teams did better than expected during the trials.

“We think it will require quite a bit of innovation from the teams,” Pratt said. “In order to let them get there, we’re going to provide more time and funding.”

It appears Google will maintain some connection to the challenge. Another company it acquired, Boston Dynamics, developed the Atlas robot that several teams are using.

But Schaft’s exit has freed up a slot and resources that will allow several other teams to compete. The full list of 11 finalists now include:

1) IHMC Robotics (Florida Institute for Human & Machine Cognition, Pensacola, Florida)
2) Tartan Rescue (Carnegie Mellon University, National Robotics Engineering Center,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)
3) Team MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts)
4) RoboSimian (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California)
5) Team TRACLabs (TRACLabs, Inc., Webster, Texas)
6) Team WPI-CMU (formerly Team WRECS, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester,
Massachusetts)
7) Team Trooper (Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories, Cherry Hill, New
Jersey)
8) Team ViGiR (TORC Robotics, Blacksburg, Virginia; TU Darmstadt, Germany; Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR)
9) Team THOR (University of California, Los Angeles, California)
10) Team Valor (Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia)
11) Team KAIST (Daejeon Metro City, Republic of Korea)

DARPA has also allowed a handful of new international teams to join, given the growing global interest in improved disaster response. It said additional details on competitors from the European Union, Japan and Korea will be revealed in the near future.

Update: This story has been updated with new information from DARPA on the team affiliations and to correct the name of Boston Dynamics.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh