Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

How Jonah Peretti and BuzzFeed Got to $850 Million

BuzzFeed could have sold to Disney, but didn’t.

BuzzFeed
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

We passed the billion dollar mark awhile ago. Today a hot tech company is worth multiple billions of dollars, easily.

So if BuzzFeed, the super-hot listicle maker that also sends reporters to Ukraine, is really a “technology company,” as investor Chris Dixon argues, then why is it worth a mere $850 million?

Because, of course, as investor Chris Dixon argues, BuzzFeed is also a media company, and media companies don’t get the same valuations as tech companies.

Except for a couple of very rare exceptions (Google, Facebook and Twitter), media companies need to pay people to make content. And without exception, media companies need to pay people to sell that content, which is why BuzzFeed has a staff of more than 500 people. Even if you want to slight the company as nothing more than a Reddit repackager, someone has to do that repackaging.

But if you’re only looking at BuzzFeed as a media company, then that $850 million might seem optimistic. Last year, people around the company pegged BuzzFeed’s 2013 revenue at $60 million, and now they’re supposedly on track for $120 million. Which means Dixon and his co-workers at Andreessen Horowitz are likely valuing Jonah Perreti’s company at something like 10x trailing 12-month sales. Investors value the New York Times at 1.2x sales. Time Inc. is at 0.77x. Time Warner, which mints money, is at 2x.

Boy, this is confusing. Can you square all this for us, Chris Dixon? Sure, says Chris Dixon, via email:

“One of the most important things you have to do in later-stage venture investing is think rigorously about how companies are categorized. For example, when we invested in Oculus last year, the big question was whether to think of it as a gaming-peripheral company, in which case the $200 million valuation we invested at seemed super high (what’s the biggest gaming peripheral exit?), versus thinking of it as a new computing platform like the mobile phone — in which case that seemed like a great bargain.

“Similarly, if you think of Buzzfeed as a print media company along the lines of the New York Times/Washington Post/Wall Street Journal, etc, the valuation seems rich. If you think about it as a strong candidate to be a key institution connecting media talent with the 5 billion people who will be using Internet-connected smartphones in a few years — a new media empire in a world where media empires reach 10-100x the audience that they used to — it seems like a bargain.

“I think the latter is true, which is why we invested, but certainly reasonable people could disagree.”

End note: You know who else thought BuzzFeed was worth something like $850 million? Disney.

I’ve seen various reports about Disney’s interest in BuzzFeed, but this is the one people around both companies seem to believe is true:

  • Sometime last year, Disney CEO Bob Iger made an offer to buy BuzzFeed for more than $500 million. Peretti and BuzzFeed chairman Ken Lerer tentatively agreed to the deal.
  • Then Peretti, who had already made a pile of money when he and Lerer sold the Huffington Post to AOL, had second thoughts, and decided he wanted to run BuzzFeed on his own, with an eye on an IPO.
  • Disney went looking for other Web deals, and ended up buying Maker Studios for somewhere between $500 million and $950 million.
  • In May, Jon Steinberg, Peretti’s COO, left the company and ended up at the Daily Mail U.K.
  • Earlier this summer, Andreessen Horowitz made what BuzzFeed’s team considers a mezzanine round investment — designed to get them to the IPO, and/or set a new price for any other buyout offers.
  • Last week, Greg Coleman, who helped the Huffington Post ramp up its ad sales before it sold to AOL, came aboard as Steinberg’s replacement.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh