Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Genentech CEO Disses Wearables, but Expects Cancer Strides Soon

Genomics and other tech tools could help drive down the soaring cost of drug approval, says Ian Clark.

Shutterstock / JMicic

Genentech CEO Ian Clark took a few swipes at wearables during an interview Thursday on the state of digital health, but stressed that there is growing promise in emerging technology for advancing medical research.

In particular, he said, improving tools for sequencing and analyzing the human genome are offering fresh insights into the underlying roots of certain illnesses.

“Our understanding of the detailed causes of many diseases is accelerating incredibly quickly,” he said during an onstage discussion with Re/code’s Kara Swisher at Rock Health’s fourth annual Health Innovation Summit in San Francisco. “Things that were hard to treat or impossible to treat are going to become treatable or chronic illnesses.”

Specifically, he said, we’ll likely see significant strides in cancer treatment in the near future, followed by advances in neurological diseases.

These technologies could also help rein in the spiraling cost of developing drugs and working them through the regulatory approval process, he said. In part, that’s because they’re more likely to be effective, eliminating expensive false paths.

Clark highlighted other promising digital health developments including telemedicine, offering patients anytime, anywhere access to medical consultations through mobile apps like Doctor on Demand and telepresence robots like iRobot’s RP-VITA.

But he twice took jabs at the much-hyped wearables space, which has been heavily funded in Silicon Valley during recent months.

He said the devices could get more interesting if they’re able to accurately monitor things like blood pressure and electrocardiography signals, the electrical activity of the heart. For now, however, he dismissed most of the wearables in today’s crowded space as “trivial.”

“I don’t doubt the wearable piece is going to be a productive business model for people,” he said. “I just don’t know whether it’s going to bend the curve in health outcomes.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh