Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

U.S. Threatened Yahoo With Huge Fines Over Refusal to Disclose User Data

Yahoo’s resistance failed, but now details of its efforts are emerging.

The U.S. government threatened to fine Yahoo as much as $250,000 per day over its refusal to turn over user data requested in 2007 and 2008.

In a blog post accompanying the release of some 1,500 pages worth of documents related to the case, Yahoo General Counsel Ron Bell described how the company stood up against requests for the data, which Yahoo deemed “overbroad” and unconstitutional. The company was seeking to avoid being swept up into what’s now known as the National Security Agency’s PRISM program.

Yahoo challenged the government’s authority before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, two secret courts where hearings are conducted outside of public scrutiny and where lawyers who appear are required to have security clearance.

The court is so secret — it deals almost exclusively with surveillance requests from the NSA and the CIA — that until recently, even disclosing that a hearing had taken place was illegal. Yahoo, seeking to vindicate itself before the court of public opinion as anything but a willing player in the PRISM scheme, sought last year to win the right to disclose papers detailing its attempt to head off the requests.

While its arguments ultimately failed, the details of its battle are now out for public view. Yahoo intends to release the entire trove of documents and is still fighting with the courts to release more, according to Bell.

“We consider this an important win for transparency, and hope that these records help promote informed discussion about the relationship between privacy, due process and intelligence gathering,” Bell wrote.

Eventually, Yahoo was one of eight companies that provided data to the government under the auspices of the PRISM program, which itself remained a secret until disclosed by way of leaks from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

Other companies, including Google and Microsoft, have won permission to release some statistics about the scope of the requests they’ve received for data from government agencies on user accounts.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh