Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The End of Ellison’s Epic Run as Oracle’s CEO

But don’t look for any major changes.

Asa Mathat

In 1977, Larry Ellison started the company that’s now called Oracle with an investment of $1,200 and two partners. As of today, the day he announced his intention to relinquish the title of CEO he has held for 37 years, it was worth $185 billion.

As the world digested the announcement, there were two significant questions, both surprisingly easy to answer.

The first is what will change at Oracle, now that presidents Mark Hurd and Safra Catz have been promoted to the position of dual CEOs. Catz answered that question on a conference call rather simply: “There will be no changes whatsoever.”

Indeed, the arrangement essentially formalizes the working relationship that has evolved at Oracle since Hurd joined as president in 2010. Ellison will continue as CTO and chairman of the board. Hurd will continue as he has, running Oracle’s sales and service operations as well as its business units devoted to selling specialized products to individual industries, or what the company calls its “vertical industry” units.

Catz, who to now has been both president and CFO, will run the finance and legal operations (she has both business and law degrees from the University of Pennsylvania) and will also oversee manufacturing operations.

Ellison will be CTO, devoting his attention to working with Oracle’s software and hardware engineering teams. Asked during a conference call for his reason for relinquishing the CEO title, his answer was simple: “Mark and Safra have both done spectacular jobs. … I am going to continue doing what I have the last several years. They deserve the recognition, they deserve the CEO title.”

Which leads us to the second and more complicated question, which is “Why now?” Since nothing is changing at Oracle in the operational sense, the answer has nothing to do with fresh eyes or new thinking about the challenges that Oracle faces.

One possible motivation is Ellison’s age: He turned 70 last month, and as much as he might protest in jest to the contrary, he isn’t getting any younger. Another motivation may simply be the one he shared on the conference call: The wish to reward Catz and Hurd and fully solidify their commitments to Oracle over the longer term.

Hurd in particular has occasionally been mentioned as a candidate for jobs outside of Oracle. During the campaign by Michael Dell to take his computer company private last year, the investment firm Blackstone, contemplating a fight for control, briefly floated Hurd’s name as a possible CEO. Hurd wasn’t interested, not even a bit, but the mere mention of his name briefly caused Oracle shares to swoon.

But there’s still no doubt where the power lies at Oracle. As of Dec. 31, Ellison controlled more than 1.1 billion Oracle shares, amounting to about 25 percent of the company, more than its 15 next largest shareholders combined. That stake is worth about $46 billion, making Ellison the seventh-richest person in the world according to Bloomberg.

As Dennis Berman of the Wall Street Journal tweeted earlier today, since Oracle shares debuted for trading in 1986, they have risen in value by an astonishing 89,640 percent as of today’s closing price. Even for Silicon Valley, accustomed as it is to large numbers and hyberbolic adjectives, it has been an epic run.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady