Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

EU Competition Regulator Seeks More Concessions From Google

Competitors and publishers accuse Google of abusing its dominance in search.

Reuters / Francois Lenoir

Google will have to make more concessions to settle a four-year-old probe in Europe into alleged abuse of its dominant position in the Internet search and advertising business after extremely negative feedback from rivals on its current offer, the European Commission said on Monday.

The move, however, casts doubts on whether European Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia will now be able to wrap the case up in the remaining two months of his mandate. He had previously aimed for a decision after the summer break.

Google has to date improved its proposal three times in response to charges from Microsoft, European publishers and competitors across Europe that it was squeezing them out in online search results and blocking advertisers from moving to competing platforms.

Last week rivals stepped up the pressure on Almunia to demand more concessions, saying a proposed deal reached in February was catastrophic for them as it would entrench Google’s market share of more than 80 percent in Europe.

In the last two months 18 companies have responded to Almunia’s stated intention to rebuff their grievances.

“In the replies to our letters the complainants have submitted new arguments and data, some of which should be taken in consideration. We are now in contact with Google to see if they are ready to offer solutions,” commission spokesman Antoine Colombani said.

He declined to say whether there was a deadline for Google to respond.

Google spokesman Al Verney said: “We continue to work with the European Commission to resolve the concerns they have raised.”

Google’s executive chairman, Eric Schmidt, defended the company in a letter in the Financial Times on Saturday, saying that there was plenty of competition in the market and that its Internet search service was built for users, not websites.

In an interview with Bloomberg TV on Sept. 6, Almunia said he was reviewing new studies presented by the competitors.

“We are trying to understand the arguments of the complaints and trying to extract from Google solutions to these solid arguments,” he was quoted as saying.

“Some of these replies are very very negative, and in some of those replies some complainants have introduced new arguments, new data, new considerations, so we now need to analyze these, and to see if we can find solutions, Google can find solutions.”

Lobby group FairSearch, whose members include complainants Microsoft, Finnish telecoms network equipment maker Nokia and online travel site TripAdvisor, expressed doubts as to whether fresh concessions would allay competition concerns.

“The commission should issue a statement of objections,” FairSearch said, referring to a charge sheet and process that could land Google a fine of up to $5 billion.

(Reporting by Foo Yun chee; Editing by Greg Mahlich)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady