Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google Partners With Auto Suppliers on Self-Driving Car

“For us to jump in and say that we can do this better, that’s arrogant,” said the head of the project.

Google has begun discussions with most of the world’s top automakers and has assembled a team of traditional and non-traditional suppliers to speed up efforts to bring self-driving cars to market by 2020, a top Google executive said on Wednesday.

“We’d be remiss not to talk to … the biggest auto manufacturers. They’ve got a lot to offer,” Chris Urmson, director of Google’s self-driving car project, said in an interview before speaking at an industry conference.

Those manufacturers, he said, include General Motors, Ford, Toyota, Daimler and Volkswagen.

“For us to jump in and say that we can do this better, that’s arrogant,” Urmson said. Google has not determined whether it will build its own self-driving vehicles or function more as a provider of systems and software to established vehicle manufacturers.

Google’s self-driving prototype cars, he said, were built in Detroit by engineering and specialty manufacturing company Roush.

Urmson’s expectation that the first fully autonomous vehicles will be production-ready within five years mirrors the view expressed a day earlier by another Silicon Valley entrepreneur, Elon Musk, chief executive of Tesla Motors.

Musk, who spoke Tuesday at the Automotive News World Congress conference, said he expects the lack of clear federal regulations covering self-driving cars could delay their introduction until 2022 or 2023.

Urmson, however, said his Google colleagues “don’t see any particular regulatory hurdles.”

Google has been briefing the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the chief U.S. auto regulator, “from early on in our program,” Urmson said. “The worst thing we could do is surprise them.”

Urmson said Google is developing and refining self-driving systems and components with such auto parts suppliers as Continental, Robert Bosch, ZF and LG Electronics. Google’s prototype cars use microprocessors made by Nvidia, a Silicon Valley chipmaker that also supplies Mercedes-Benz and other automakers.

Google shortly will begin deploying a test fleet of fully functioning prototypes of its pod-like self-driving car, which dispenses with such familiar automotive parts as steering wheel, brakes and accelerator pedal. While each of the Google prototypes will have a “test driver” on board, the cars have no provision for human intervention in steering or braking.

Urmson suggested the no-frills look of the Google prototypes — a far cry from the opulent appearance of the self-driving F015 concept vehicle unveiled last week by Mercedes — does not necessarily reflect the final design for production.

He described the Google prototype as “a practical, near-term testing platform” that will evolve over time.

“Airliners today don’t look like the Wright brothers’ flyer” of 100 years ago, he said. “If you looked at carriages back before we had cars, they looked quite different than cars today.”

Urmson said self-driving cars represent a “transformative” moment in the evolution of transportation, an opportunity to extend motoring to blind, elderly and disabled persons who otherwise could not drive.

“You’re really changing the relationship you have with transportation. You’re changing what it means to get around.”

Regarding Google’s desire to partner with traditional automakers and suppliers, Urmson decried as “baloney” the notion of Silicon Valley as a hotbed of innovation compared with “old stodgy” Detroit.

Automakers, he said, are “doing something incredibly complicated.”

“You look at a car … and people forget just how much magic there is in that thing.”

(Reporting by Paul Lienert and Joe White in Detroit; editing by Matthew Lewis)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady