Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Block Wi-Fi? Who, Us? Marriott Backs Away From Controversial Plan.

The hotel chain backed away from its Wi-Fi blocking effort after customers complained.

ValeStock/Shutterstock

Congratulations Marriott customers, you can now use your MiFi and personal hotspots with impunity. The hotel chain dropped its campaign to block personal Wi-Fi hotspots on its properties Wednesday after a public outcry.

Saying it listens to its customers, Marriott announced it “will not block guests from using their personal Wi-Fi devices at any of our managed hotels,” in a statement Wednesday. The company initially told Inc. magazine about the change.

Marriott and other hotel chains asked the Federal Communications Commission for permission to block Wi-Fi devices on hotel properties this summer, citing concerns about hackers establishing malicious hotspots.

Critics complained the hotel chain was simply trying to charge its guests — particularly companies using its conference spaces — for Internet access.

In October, the FCC fined Marriott $600,000 for blocking personal Wi-Fi hotspots at its Gaylord Opryland Hotel and Convention Space. Since Wi-Fi devices operate on unlicensed airwaves, anyone can use them and the federal government generally prohibits parties from knocking out rival networks.

Facing criticism from guests (and many technology companies), Marriott tried to clarify its request in late December, saying the company only wanted to block personal Wi-Fi hotspots in its convention or business spaces, not guest rooms.

But it even backed off that plan Wednesday. Marriott’s full statement below:

Marriott International listens to its customers, and we will not block guests from using their personal Wi-Fi devices at any of our managed hotels. Marriott remains committed to protecting the security of Wi-Fi access in meeting and conference areas at our hotels. We will continue to look to the FCC to clarify appropriate security measures network operators can take to protect customer data, and will continue to work with the industry and others to find appropriate market solutions that do not involve the blocking of Wi-Fi devices.

Update: A Marriott spokesman said Wednesday night that while the hotel chain has stopped blocking Wi-Fi devices at its properties, it still wants the FCC to consider the petition it filed jointly with the American Hospitality & Lodging Association to allow Wi-Fi blocking. So opponents of the Wi-Fi blocking plan may not want to start celebrating just yet.

Update: In an interview Thursday afternoon, Marriott’s Harvey Kellman explained the company still wants FCC guidance on how it might block Wi-Fi signals to stop hackers, but the hotel chain won’t block at six properties where the technology is installed for now. “We will only consider the use of the blocking capability when there is a clear cyber-security risk,” said Kellman, a senior attorney for the hotel giant.

A few telecom lawyers emailed Re/code Wednesday night noting Marriott agreed to stop blocking in November as part of its FCC settlement, but Kellman said that agreement was limited to Marriott’s Opryland facility.

(Arguably, Marriott had to stop blocking at all of its hotels because FCC could have fined it for continuing the practice at other locations. The agency had accused Marriott of blocking Wi-Fi users “who did not pose a threat to the security” of Opryland or its guests.)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh