Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

That Was Fast: Wavelength, the Movie-Sharing Service Hollywood Didn’t Love, Is on Hold

The startup launched less than two weeks ago. Now it’s “speak[ing] with key industry constituents.”

Ryan Jorgensen - Jorgo/Shutterstock
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Wavelength sounds like an interesting idea — a Web service that lets friends watch Hollywood movies their other friends own, without having to pay a penny. Unless you make or sell Hollywood movies, in which case it might sound like a bad idea.

Someone has apparently conveyed that sentiment to Wavelength founder Spencer Wang, who has hit “pause” on his new service, less than two weeks after launching.

“We are for the time being closing the wavelength.io beta as we speak with key industry constituents to showcase that wavelength.io is a great thing for consumers and the film business,” says a message that went up on the site on Monday. “We feel this is the right move in order to build a sustainable and awesome service for you. We hope to be back soon.”

Wavelength is supposed to let users stream the movies their friends own, as long as they’ve bought them using UltraViolet, the system Hollywood studios set up to encourage home movie sales.

Wang, a former Wall Street media analyst, has argued that his system would help spur flagging home video sales. But it’s easy to see how the movie guys, and the people who help them distribute and sell their product, might think otherwise.

In fact, Wang already expected Hollywood to make his service harder to use by changing the UltraViolet terms of service that lets multiple people watch a single movie. But he figured that would happen next month; his plan was to spend the next few weeks rounding up users so he could make his case to Hollywood with a little bit of leverage.

I’ve asked Wang for comment. Here’s the full text of the message that logged-in users can see:

Update

One of our goals in launching the wavelength.io beta was bringing to market legal movie sharing, wrapped around a great UltraViolet experience. We are incredibly humbled by the outpouring of interest and goodwill from everybody.

Not surprisingly, what we have built has been controversial. We are for the time being closing the wavelength.io beta as we speak with key industry constituents to showcase that wavelength.io is a great thing for consumers and the film business. We feel this is the right move in order to build a sustainable and awesome service for you. We hope to be back soon.

For further updates, you can follow us on Facebook, WordPress, Twitter, YouTube and Instagram. If you would like to help spread the word you can invite your friends here. Thank you.

If you would like to support us, please reserve your place on our waitlist by creating your UltraViolet account if you don’t have one. If you do have one, please link it. For more information on UltraViolet™, please refer to uvvu.com.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh