Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Box Sets January 22 Target for $187 Million IPO

The pitch to investors — on hold since the initial filing last March — has begun.

Asa Mathat

Cloud storage and collaboration company Box took another big step on the path to its initial public offering, saying in an amended regulatory filing that it plans to sell 12.5 million shares at a price as high as $13 in a bid to raise as much as $187 million.

The range would give Box a valuation of about $1.5 billion, down from an implied valuation of $2.4 billion when it last raised money from private investors TPG and Coatue Management in July.

Box has also started making its official pitch to investors. Its prospectus appeared this morning on the website Retail Roadshow, including a 32-minute video presentation by CEO Aaron Levie. The offering is expected to price on Jan. 22 and will trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol BOX.

Box’s IPO plans had been in a holding pattern following its initial filing last March. Shortly after, the valuations of several publicly traded cloud software companies declined, prompting Box to wait for more favorable market conditions.

Levie just tweeted a not-so-veiled reference to the delay:

https://twitter.com/levie/status/553588435832029186

Most of the numbers in the filing remained unchanged from the one released in December. The company is on a run rate to $225 million in annual revenue, and for the nine months ended Oct. 31 had posted nearly $154 million in revenue, up 80 percent from the year-ago period. The filing shows that Box had 44,000 companies paying to use its service, though if you listen carefully to Levie’s comments on the video you’ll hear him raise that number slightly to 45,000.

One metric I’ll call out only because it’s new to me: Customer retention. Once a company starts paying for Box’s services, it tends to add more users to upgrade to higher levels of features over time. Levie has occasionally referred to this strategy as “land and expand.”

Box calls out its customer retention rate at 130 percent, which sounds a little weird, but in English it comes down to this: Among its biggest bloc of customers — companies paying at least $5,000 year — most renew their contracts annually at the same level of service they had before. Some — about a third — opt to pay more in their second or third year because they’ve added more features and users, while about five percent don’t renew at all. It’s an odd metric but an important one which Box should probably revisit and rename once the offering is done.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady