Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

This is the best indication yet that Bernie Sanders is serious about winning

Democratic presidential candidate Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) speaks to guests at an event sponsored by Institute of Politics at the University of Chicago on September 28, 2015, in Chicago, Illinois.
Democratic presidential candidate Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) speaks to guests at an event sponsored by Institute of Politics at the University of Chicago on September 28, 2015, in Chicago, Illinois.
Democratic presidential candidate Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) speaks to guests at an event sponsored by Institute of Politics at the University of Chicago on September 28, 2015, in Chicago, Illinois.
Scott Olson/Getty Images

Bernie Sanders has closed the gap on Hillary Clinton in national polling and in fundraising, but he’s clinging to the hope that he can win without going negative on her.

At least for now.

In what is the most compelling evidence yet that Sanders is serious about winning the Democratic nomination, and the presidency, he told former Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod that he hasn’t ruled out running negative ads for the first time in his career.

“It’s my hope that I will never run a negative ad,” Sanders said this week in an interview with Axelrod, who is now in charge of the University of Chicago’s Institute of Politics. “I never have after all these years. But I — we’ll see.”

While Axelrod didn’t target Clinton specifically with his question — asking if Sanders could get through the entire 2016 campaign without negative ads — Sanders is already drawing contrasts with Clinton on the stump.

Running negative ads would be a tougher call for Sanders, who raised $26 million to Clinton’s $28 million — not counting her Super PAC funds — in the reporting period that ended September 30. On the one hand, running clean campaigns has been a hallmark of his political career and a point he emphasizes at campaign stops. On the other, as I wrote after watching Sanders on a two-day swing through Iowa this past weekend, he may not have done enough yet to drive voters away from Clinton:

He may have to sharpen contrasts with Clinton — to turn more Democrats against her — to make the case that he’d be a better nominee and president. Sanders will have to decide whether it’s worth risking his brand to do that.

“I think she has a better chance of winning, and I really want to see a Democrat as president,” Gail Klearman, who plans to caucus for Clinton, told me after a Sanders event in Waukee on Sunday. “I agree with him on more issues than I do with Hillary. But not by a whole lot.”

It’s that distance Sanders would try to widen if he hit the airwaves with attacks on Clinton. Either way, the fact that Sanders is entertaining the possibility of running negative ads is an indication that he sees himself as an increasingly serious contender for the presidency.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters