Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

AT&T Readies Technology to Let Multiple Devices Share One Phone Number

AT&T has been working for more than a year on the technology behind NumberSync, which doesn’t require the primary device to be nearby -- or even turned on.

Asa Mathat

AT&T is nearly ready to launch a feature that will allow a customer’s smartphone, tablet and other devices to share a single phone number.

The feature, now called NumberSync, is a key to making it more attractive for customers to own multiple devices with built-in wireless connections, just as it was important to offer shared data plans.

As previously reported by Re/code, AT&T has been testing the underlying technology, code-named Cascade, since at least last year. It was developed in part at the company’s Foundry incubator in Palo Alto, Calif.

“This is really a first in the industry that we are giving customers the ability to do this,” AT&T Mobility CEO Glenn Lurie told Re/code.

AT&T said it expects to launch NumberSync on an initial device “fairly soon” with additional devices coming later this year. Many existing smartphones will be able to support the feature through a software upgrade; the company’s goal is to work with all manufacturers to support the feature going forward in both phones and connected devices, such as tablets and watches.

There won’t be a separate charge to share one number, but AT&T already charges a per-device fee, typically $5 or $10, for each device that connects to a shared data plan.

Because NumberSync is network-based, AT&T says the technology will work even if the primary phone is off and doesn’t require any devices to be near one another. Apple, for example, has features that allow users to answer calls on their Mac or tablet, but require the device to be on the same network.

Lurie has said he expects that wearables with cellular connections will become the norm, though he acknowledged at last week’s Code/Mobile that uptake of such devices has been slower than he had initially thought.

“For us to really have the wearable space explode … those devices have to work in concert with each other,” Lurie said.

Another place where NumberSync is likely to show up is in the connected car, Lurie said, noting that pairing smartphones to cars via bluetooth remains a complicated experience. Over time, NumberSync could also allow people to take calls on various devices in their home and office, Lurie said.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady