Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Here’s Why I’ll Be on Netflix’s Q3 Earnings Call Today

I’ve got questions for Reed Hastings.

Asa Mathat
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Netflix releases its Q3 earnings later today. Normally that would mean I would spend the afternoon writing about the streaming service’s new numbers, then listening to the company’s earnings call.

But today is a little different: Instead of listening to the call, I’ll be on it, alongside RBC analyst Mark Mahaney, asking CEO Reed Hastings and his top executives about the company’s performance.

This is an unusual way for a company to conduct an earnings call, and an unusual role for a journalist, so let me give you a little context: For the past couple of years, Netflix has been allowing outsiders — usually Wall Street analysts who cover the company, though CNBC’s Julia Boorstin has also participated — to conduct its earnings calls, which means they are essentially conducting live interviews.

Netflix doesn’t share any of its earnings information with its questioners in advance, and — this is crucial — doesn’t get to see what its interviewers are going to ask in advance, either. Other than asking me to participate, and setting me up with a facility to join the livestream later today, I haven’t had any contact with Netflix about the call; neither has Mark.

The notion of a journalist participating in an earnings call hosted by a company he or she covers is unusual, and it took us some time at Re/code to be comfortable with the idea — the first time this came up, we declined. But we’ve changed our minds. Netflix has no control over our questions, and asking people those questions is the most basic component of my job. So I’m treating this just like any other interview.

So that’s the background. Here’s the part where you come in: Mark and I have our own questions we would like to ask, and we’ll have more once we see Netflix’s new numbers today. But we’d also like to hear what you’d like to ask Reed Hastings and company. If you’ve got questions of your own, please send them along to me at peter@recode.net, and we’ll try to work some of them into the session.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh