Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Sprint to Pay $2.95 Million for Failing to Notify Lower-Credit Customers They Were Being Charged Extra

The settlement, which requires court approval, also requires the carrier to give earlier notice if it plans to charge a customer more than those with better credit.

Sprint

The Federal Trade Commission said Wednesday that Sprint will pay $2.95 million in civil penalties to settle charges it failed to give proper notice to those with lower credit scores that they were being charged higher fees than more creditworthy customers.

In its complaint, the FTC said that Sprint put some such customers in a program that required them to pay a $7.99 monthly fee on top of their other charges.

“Sprint failed to give many consumers required information about why they were placed in a more costly program, and when they did, the notice often came too late for consumers to choose another mobile carrier,” FTC consumer protection bureau director Jessica Rich said in a statement.

The FTC said Sprint failed to provide timely notice, often alerting consumers only after the time period in which they could cancel their service without a fee.

The proposed settlement, which is subject to court approval, would also require Sprint to provide customers with earlier notice of being placed in a higher-priced plan.

Sprint, for its part, said it was including almost all of the relevant information in its disclosures, but made changes in July as part of its effort to settle the matter.

“Sprint puts its customers first and is always working to provide clear and necessary information to customers,” the company said in a statement. “We appreciated the dialogue with the FTC and we have already implemented the changes requested.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh