Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Candidates say states can legalize pot. But only Bernie Sanders’s plan really allows it.

On Wednesday, Bernie Sanders took a truly historic position: He became the first major presidential candidate to support removing marijuana from the US drug schedules and ending prohibition at the federal level.

But more than making history, Sanders took the only position on marijuana that’s actually consistent with states’ rights. In fact, it’s the only position consistent with what much of the presidential field, including Democrats, has said but not followed up on: that marijuana policy should be left to the states.

Sanders’s plan would not legalize marijuana nationwide. It would simply exempt pot from the federal scheduling system, much in the same way alcohol and tobacco are exempted. This means states could still choose to prohibit marijuana or legalize it — but they would no longer face the threat of federal interference if they did legalize.

Most of the presidential candidates say this is what they want: Although candidates like Hillary Clinton, Martin O’Malley, and Jeb Bush personally oppose or are unsure about marijuana legalization, they have said they wouldn’t interfere with states’ decision to legalize if elected president. This stance seems to embrace a continuation of the Obama administration’s approach, in which states that legalize are largely left alone as long as pot doesn’t fall into kids’ or criminal organizations’ hands.

But even the Obama administration’s approach leaves major federal restrictions on pot. Marijuana’s schedule 1 status makes it difficult for researchers to study the drug. It makes it harder for pot businesses to use banking services, forcing many to lie on applications to banks or run as cash-only operations. It means pot shops can’t file for tax deductions available to other businesses, sometimes pushing their effective tax rates to as high as 90 percent. And since marijuana is still considered a dangerous and highly prohibited schedule 1 drug, the Drug Enforcement Administration can still technically raid marijuana shops at its whim (and it does).

Sanders’s plan would address all of these issues: By taking marijuana out of the federal drug schedules, the proposal would let state-legal pot shops and growers truly operate without the constant fear of the federal government cracking down on them.

Other candidates support easing restrictions. Martin O’Malley and Rand Paul said they would like to reclassify marijuana from schedule 1 to schedule 2. But this would still maintain heavy restrictions on marijuana, particularly on business tax deductions. (Remember: Cocaine and meth are still schedule 2.)

Sanders’s plan, then, would do the most to let states legalize marijuana. He’s the only candidate really putting his policies where his words are when it comes to legalization.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz
Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp