Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Canada’s prime minister said marijuana is “infinitely worse” than tobacco. Absolutely not.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper on Saturday, October 3, made the most incorrect statement possible about drug policy.

Asked about the Conservative Party’s opposition to marijuana legalization, Harper said, “Tobacco is a product that does a lot of damage. Marijuana is infinitely worse.”

It is difficult to overstate just how wrong Harper is. Tobacco’s health effects cause 37,000 deaths in Canada each year — an astonishing 17 percent of all deaths in the country. Marijuana, meanwhile, has never been conclusively linked to any deaths from direct health effects. Even the scientific evidence on whether pot causes lung damage when smoked is mixed, with studies that control for tobacco smoking finding no significant effect from marijuana on lung cancer risk.

One caveat: A very small number of people likely die due to accidents while under the effects of marijuana. But this data isn’t reliably tracked, and there’s still some debate about whether pot even significantly increases this risk.

Of course, this is true not just in Canada, but in the US too. In fact, the top three deadliest drugs in the United States are legal: tobacco, alcohol, and opioid painkillers. Some of that, of course, is caused by their legality, which makes them more accessible and more widely used. But tobacco in particular is so deadly that it’s unlikely anything would catch up to it even if all drugs were legalized.

Now, drugs carry dangers other than death. Marijuana’s biggest risk, Jon Caulkins of Carnegie Mellon University previously told me, is dependency and loss of productivity: “At some level, we know that spending more than half of your waking hours intoxicated for years and years on end is not increasing the likelihood that you’ll win a Pulitzer Prize or discover the cure for cancer.”

But this is a fairly abstract risk — one that affects a minority of pot users. Tobacco, on the other hand, will almost certainly kill you or take years away from your life through long-term use. It is much, much worse than marijuana.


Correction: The headline and tweet for this article originally flipped the quote.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters