Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

No IPO Pop for Pure Storage in $425 Million NYSE Debut

Shares fall as much as 6 percent on the first day of trading.

Via Twitter

Shares of Pure Storage, the enterprise company devoted to using flash memory technology to store corporate data, fell on their first day of trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

Having priced Tuesday night at $17 a share, the offering valued Pure at nearly $3.2 billion. The shares opened for trading at $16.74 and fell as much as 6 percent to as low as $16.00 as of 11:30 am PT and later closed at $16.01.

Pure raised about $425 million in the offering. But the decline on its opening day may give pause to other companies mulling an IPO in the coming months. Pure was the largest venture-capital-backed offering of the year, having raised $470 million from VC firms including Greylock Partners, Redpoint Ventures and Index Ventures. So far this year at least 47 companies have withdrawn plans to go public, according to data gathered by Renaissance Capital.

In an interview with CNBC, CEO Scott Dietzen said he was encouraging his company to “think long term” and not worry about short-term results. (See video below.)

Pure is the third company emphasizing flash memory in the data center to go public in recent memory. The other two were Fusion-io, now a unit of SanDisk, which debuted in 2011, and Violin Memory, which floated in 2013. Both offerings faltered.

There’s no argument that Pure is growing fast. It closed the first half of its 2015 fiscal year on July 31 with revenue of nearly $159 million, up 171 percent from the prior year’s period. It posted a net loss for the period of nearly $113 million, up 18 percent from the prior year. Combined operating expenses rose from $126.5 million to north of $205 million, led by sales and marketing costs, which rose by 51 percent.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh