Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Snapchat Tries Another Way to Make Money: More In-App Purchases

Snapchat is selling lenses now, too.

Snapchat is trying to figure out how to turn its 100 million-plus daily users into daily contributors to its bottom line, and it’s throwing all kinds of ideas at the wall to see what sticks.

On Friday it started testing another: A “lens store” where users can pay 99 cents to transform their selfies by adding special effects or costumes to the image. The company has offered free lenses for a few months, and even tested its first sponsored lens last month with Fox Studios to promote the new “Peanuts” movie. But some of the original, popular lenses — like the one that allows users to “puke” rainbows — disappeared over time to make room for new designs. Well, now Snapchat is bringing them back for a small fee.

The store isn’t so much a destination within the app as it is a prompt to purchase a lens that’s no longer available for free. It’s the second type of in-app purchase the company has rolled out since September. You can also buy “replays” within the app, which allows you to rewatch a snap that you’ve already seen.

On the surface, in-app purchases seem like a small revenue driver compared to Snapchat’s more mature ad products, which can generate well over half a million dollars for just 24 hours in some cases. But the idea of charging 99 cents for anything within the app just shows how important revenue is for Snapchat — and how it’s still trying to figure out which revenue drivers may actually work. The store helps set a precedent for other in-app purchases down the road, too, which the company has hinted at in the past.

Snapchat is still working to live up to a $16 billion valuation, after all, and it didn’t get a glowing endorsement this week from investor Fidelity, which downgraded the value of the company stock it holds by 25 percent. Selfies can’t hurt.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh