Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Why Losing DraftKings, FanDuel Could Add Insult to Injury for the TV Guys

It’s not just the TV ad money. It’s the TV ad money.

DraftKings via YouTube
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

If you work at DraftKings and FanDuel, or if you’ve invested in those companies, you are probably pretty nervous right now.

This is also true if you run a TV network that has spent the last few months harvesting ad money from DraftKings and FanDuel. What happens if that money goes away because DraftKings and FanDuel go away?

The answer, according to Bernstein analyst Todd Juenger: A double whammy for the TV guys.

Juneger estimates DraftKings and FanDuel spent $134 million on TV ads in Q3, most of which went to the four big programmers that show NFL games — CBS, ESPN, Fox and NBC*. That represents 1.8 percent of the TV networks’ total ad revenue — but 59.1 percent of the TV guys’ growth last quarter.

But the DraftKings and FanDuel money has even more impact than that, Juenger argues: The influx of daily fantasy ads pushed up the prices of other ads: “By claiming huge chunks of inventory in an already inventory-scarce environment, this spending drove up scatter pricing across the board,” he writes in a note today.

My bet remains that DraftKings, FanDuel and the rest of the new industry find some way to survive, in large part because their existence is now important to a big chunk of America’s industrial entertainment complex. But if they go away …

* NBC is owned by Comcast, which is a minority investor in Vox Media, which owns this site.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh