Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Apple Retail Workers’ Class Action Suit Dismissed

Store employees wanted to be compensated for the time they spent waiting for their bags to be searched.

Anthony Quintano for Re/code

A federal judge has dismissed a class action suit brought by Apple retail workers over the company’s bag-search policy.

The hourly retail workers were asking to be paid for the time spent waiting for a manager or security guard to search their bags before they left the Apple store for meal breaks or at the end of the day. The company said it conducts these searches to deter theft.

The plaintiffs, Amanda Friekin and Dean Pelle, brought a class action suit in June, claiming that state labor laws entitled them to be compensated for this time.

In a ruling Saturday, Judge William Alsup of the Federal District Court in San Francisco sided with Apple, finding that the decision to bring a bag to work is a choice — and retail workers could avoid the wait by leaving such items at home.

“Apple could have alleviated that concern [about theft] by prohibiting its employees from bringing personal bags or personal Apple devices into the store,” Alsup wrote. “Instead, Apple took the lesser step of giving its employees the optional benefit of bringing such items to work, which comes with the conditions that they must undergo searches … before they exit the store.”

The plaintiff’s attorney could immediately be reached for comment, and Apple declined comment.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh