Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Missouri legislators want to revoke student athletes’ scholarships if they boycott

Graduate student Jonathan Butler started the protests at the University of Missouri, but the football team later joined him.
Graduate student Jonathan Butler started the protests at the University of Missouri, but the football team later joined him.
Graduate student Jonathan Butler started the protests at the University of Missouri, but the football team later joined him.
Michael B. Thomas/Getty Images
Libby Nelson
Libby Nelson was Vox’s editorial director, politics and policy, leading coverage of how government action and inaction shape American life. Libby has more than a decade of policy journalism experience, including at Inside Higher Ed and Politico. She joined Vox in 2014.

Some Missouri state legislators are upset about the protests over racism, backed by the football team, that ousted the University of Missouri’s president and chancellor. And they want to make sure it never happens again.

Two legislators have introduced a bill that would revoke the scholarships of any college athletes who refuse to play for reasons other than health.

That would have stopped the football team’s boycotts that made the Missouri protests, started by black student activists and embraced by the team and its coach, national news.

It’s harder for colleges to revoke athletes’ scholarships than it used to be. Colleges used to be granted wide discretion under the heading of “substandard” athletic performance. But as Jeremy Stahl wrote at Slate in November, the SEC, Missouri’s conference, changed its rules this year so that scholarships could only be revoked for violating “institutional and/or team policies.”

It’s not clear if that would protect Missouri athletes if the bill were to actually pass.

Go deeper:

  • Steve Silver, a former Las Vegas Sun sports reporter and lawyer, writes at the Legal Blitz that this would probably violate athletes’ First Amendment rights.
  • The Kansas City Star interviewed Missouri’s interim president on what’s next for the university.
  • A study earlier this year found student athletes were more likely to volunteer, but less likely to be activists in electoral politics. The Missouri protests might change that.

More in Politics

Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz
Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp