Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

New York Times Amends, Attaches Editors’ Note to Story on San Bernardino Attacker’s Alleged Facebook Post (Updated)

The editors’ note was attached a day after the FBI Director publicly corrected the report.

Andrew Burton / Getty Images North America

On December 12, the New York Times reported that San Bernardino attacker Tashfeen Malik had “talked openly on social media” about supporting violent extremism, prior to the December 2 mass shooting.

At a news conference Wednesday, FBI Director James Comey said those reports were wrong and that Malik had not publicly posted on the matter. On Thursday, the New York Times attached an editors’ note to the December 12 story, acknowledging the error.

“Law enforcement officials subsequently told The Times that Ms. Malik communicated with her husband in emails and private messages, and on a dating site,” the note reads. “Ms. Malik’s comments to Mr. Farook about violent jihad were made on a messaging platform, officials said.”

The Times was not the only news outlet to report that Malik made public Facebook posts about the shooting before the attacks. On December 4, NBC, the Associated Press and the New York Times reported that Malik had “pledged allegiance to the Islamic State in a Facebook post,” one that Malik reportedly made around the time the shooting began (see update below for more details).

As to whether a correction or editors’ note was in the works for the December 4 article, a spokesman for the New York Times told Re/code that he had “nothing to share on that at the moment.” Phone messages were left for representatives of NBC.

When asked why the Times had attached an editors’ note to the December 12 article instead of a correction, the representative directed Re/code toward a blog post by the paper’s public editor, Margaret Sullivan, that says editors’ notes “may indicate a violation of ethical standards or other serious lapse.”

Matt Apuzzo, the lead reporter on that piece, told Re/code to look at his tweets for his comment on the editors’ note.

https://twitter.com/mattapuzzo/status/677644329012355072

https://twitter.com/mattapuzzo/status/677644534214447104

The “Gchat-like messaging system” to which Apuzzo is referring sounds a lot like Facebook Messenger.

Update: A representative from the AP reached out to specify that the Facebook post to which their reporting was referring was one Malik made “just before” the shooting began. From the criminal complaint filed against the attackers’ neighbor (who allegedly purchased the weapons used): “A post on a Facebook page associated with Malik stated, ‘We pledge allegiance to Khalifa bu bkr al bhaghdadi al quraishi.’ (AGENT NOTE: Based on my training and experience, I believe that Malik was referring to Abu Bakhr Al Baghdadi, who is the leader of ISIL). “

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh