Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Venerated VC Michael Moritz Opens Mouth, Inserts Foot on Question About Hiring Women

Moritz was talking with Bloomberg’s Emily Chang.

Re/code

There are jarringly few women who work in the venture capital industry. Almost 80 percent of VC firms have never appointed a woman to represent them on the board of a portfolio company. In Sequoia Capital’s case that kind of move would actually be impossible; they don’t have any female VCs to appoint.

That’s why it didn’t come as much of a surprise when Sequoia Capital Chairman Michael Moritz in an interview with Bloomberg this week delivered an astoundingly out-of-touch and dismissive answer to questions about hiring women. Moritz is the chairman of Sequoia Capital, a former Google board member, a billionaire (three times over) and perhaps the closest thing Silicon Valley venture capital has to royalty; he was literally made a knight of the British Empire in 2013.

Moritz gave interviewer Emily Chang — who should be praised for refusing to let him off the hook over the course of the two minutes they spent talking about this — virtually every discredited stock answer in the book when Chang pointed out that Sequoia doesn’t have any women investing partners*.

  • We are gender-blind, race-blind, everything-blind: “I like to think, and genuinely believe, that we are blind to somebody’s sex, to their religion, to their background — we probably have more different nationalities working at Sequoia — it’s a very cosmopolitan setting. The fact that we’ve embraced China, embraced India, operated in Israel for a long time.”
  • It’s a “pipeline” education problem: “I think the issue begins in our high schools, and where women particularly in America and also in Europe, tend to elect not to study the sciences when they’re 11 or 12. So suddenly the hiring pool is much smaller.”
  • We’ll hire women, we just don’t want to lower our standards: “In fact, we just hired a young woman from Stanford who’s every bit as good as her peers. And if there are more like her, we’ll hire them. What we’re not prepared to do, is to lower our standards.”
  • We’re too busy focusing on performance to discriminate: “[The limited partners] care about performance. Our job is to field the very best team at Sequoia — whether they’re black or white or female or male or Muslim or Christian — we don’t care.”

For years, women and diversity advocates in tech have argued against this kind of thinking, pointing out that it enables and perpetuates the institutional discrimination that affects women in the industry: If you are gender-blind, then why is your firm practically all-male? Who is suggesting that Sequoia “lower [its] standards” to bring in more women?

In a statement Sequoia provided to Re/code, Moritz said, “I know there are many remarkable women who would flourish in the venture business. We’re working hard to find them and would be ecstatic if more joined Sequoia or other firms.”

Sequoia spokesman Andrew Kovacs also noted over the phone that the firm has three female investors in China and two female investors in India, and added that while people “rightly” point out that Sequoia has no investing partners in the U.S., both its CFO and marketing partner are women.

Below is the full text of Moritz’s remarks (minus Chang’s questions) and here’s a link to the video interview.

We think about it a lot. I like to think, and genuinely believe, that we are blind to somebody’s sex, to their religion, to their background — we probably have more different nationalities working at Sequoia — it’s a very cosmopolitan setting. The fact that we’ve embraced China, embraced India, operated in Israel for a long time. The real question you might have is why for example aren’t there more women?

We have many more women working in our China business than our U.S. business. I think the issue begins in our high schools, and where women particularly in America and also in Europe, tend to elect not to study the sciences when they’re 11 or 12. So suddenly the hiring pool is much smaller.

We look very hard. In fact, we just hired a young woman from Stanford who’s every bit as good as her peers. And if there are more like her, we’ll hire them. What we’re not prepared to do, is to lower our standards. But if there are fabulously bright, driven women who are very interested in technology, very hungry to succeed and can meet our performance standards we’ll hire them all day and night.

[The limited partners] care about performance. Our job is to field the very best team at Sequoia — whether they’re black or white or female or male or Muslim or Christian — we don’t care.

* Sequoia does have one female analyst on the investment team.

https://twitter.com/sequoia/status/672502717131034624

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh