Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Apple Updates Its News App to Make It More Like a ... Newspaper

There’s also an update for publishers, too. Will that make you use it?

Everett Historical / Shutterstock.com
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Apple is tweaking its News app, with hopes of making the personalized newsreader more appealing for both users and publishers.

Apple’s update for its iOS app, which begins rolling out today, has two components. Only one of them will be visible to regular users: Apple’s editors will curate a list of “top stories” they’ll display for all of the apps’ users, at least a couple of times a day.

That’s a change in philosophy from this fall’s launch, when the app was supposed to highlight stories based on each of its users’ tastes and reading behaviors.

That’s still going to happen throughout the day, but in the morning and in the afternoon, Apple will assemble a handful of stories it thinks all of its users would want to see. You know — like a newspaper.

The other change matters only to the publishers that are letting Apple run their content, in full, on their app: Apple says it is turning on an integration with ComScore, the Web traffic counter, so publishers can get advertiser credit for the views their content generates.

The fact that ComScore hasn’t been set up until now has been one of the complaints publishers have had with Apple News. Another is that the app’s performance has generally been underwhelming, both in terms of presentation and the audience numbers it has generated so far.

Apple won’t comment about those criticisms. But the fact that it’s not only hand-selecting some stories for is entire audience, but also limiting those picks to stories published by mainstream publishers, like Bloomberg, CNN and the New York Times, suggests that it’s acknowledging that the app is a work in progress.

One thing you don’t hear publishers complaining about are the deal terms Apple is offering for their content. Publishers can keep 100 percent of the advertising revenue they generate for their own content, and Apple will give publishers 70 percent of revenue for ads it sells on its own.

This kind of “off platform” publishing arrangement would have created a lot of nervous teeth-gnashing among publishers a year ago, but now, in a Facebook Instant Articles/Snapchat Discover world, it’s par for the course. The issue for publishers isn’t whether to publish on other platforms — it’s which ones they want to invest energy in. Apple still needs to make its case.

(Vox Media, which owns this site, is an Apple News partner.)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh