Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Twitter Is Testing a New Order for Tweets

The reverse chronological timeline is getting a makeover.

Kurt Wagner

One of Twitter’s most distinctive characteristics has always been that its content shows up in reverse chronological order — meaning that whoever tweets first is inevitably last on your timeline.

But now Twitter is testing a new timeline order for some users that ignores that standard and inserts some tweets higher up in the queue. A company spokesperson confirmed the experiment to Re/code but declined to share details on how it decides which tweets should be bumped up.

The obvious explanation is that Twitter is looking for ways to surface its best content. It’s clear that Twitter is using some kind of algorithm to determine which tweets merit a break in the timeline — it’s already doing something similar with its “while you were away” feature that showcases top tweets sent since the last time you opened the app. It’s probable this new experiment uses the same (or very similar) signals.

Tuesday’s test is worth pointing out for two reasons. It’s clear that Twitter is working very hard to make sure people can find the “best” tweets on the service, something that has always been a challenge. It’s the key reason Twitter launched Moments, to surface the best tweets around specific real-world events.

But moving away from the reverse chronological order is also a sign that CEO Jack Dorsey isn’t afraid to mess with the company’s signature product characteristics. It’s why Twitter is working on a product to let users tweet more than 140 characters. These are big changes that many of the product’s die-hard users are not supportive of. But it’s clear that Dorsey needs to grow the company’s stagnant user total, and that means tough decisions.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Politics
Data centers could actually be good for your hometownData centers could actually be good for your hometown
Politics

The case for the buildings America loves to hate.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
How to fall in love with humanity againHow to fall in love with humanity again
Future Perfect

Tech culture has made contempt for humanity feel enlightened. We can do better.

By Sigal Samuel
America, Actually
Inside the fight over America’s data centersInside the fight over America’s data centers
Podcast
America, Actually

“The ugliest thing I’ve ever seen”: How New Jersey residents feel about a data center in their backyard.

By Astead Herndon
Podcasts
Could you spot an AI-written book?Could you spot an AI-written book?
Podcast
Podcasts

An author set up an experiment to find out.

By Amina Al-Sadi and Noel King
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram