Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Battle for the Second Screen

Nearly 40 percent of people surveyed are already making the effort to synchronize their watching on the big screen with the small screen in front of them.

Scott Bedford/Shutterstock

A version of this essay was originally published at Tech.pinions, a website dedicated to informed opinions, insight and perspective on the tech industry.


Advances in smart TVs, set-top boxes and cord-cutting services have driven some important improvements in TV viewing for most consumers. But there’s still one glaring hole when it comes to a truly modern connected TV experience: Synchronized second-screen content.

The vast majority (75 percent to 80 percent, according to a recent survey conducted by Technalysis Research of more than 3,000 consumers across the U.S., U.K., Germany, Brazil and China) of device-owning people who watch TV admit to using their additional devices, such as notebooks, tablets and smartphones, while viewing. So the obvious question is, why not try and link the two device experiences together?

Nearly 40 percent of people surveyed are already making the effort to manually tie together what they’re watching on the big screen to the small screen in front of them.

In fact, the case for doing so gets even stronger when you look into what people are doing on those second screens while they’re watching TV. In the case of PCs, the top five activities conducted on a PC while watching TV are: Browsing the Web in general, reading personal email, online shopping, browsing the Web for content tied to what they’re watching (more than 39 percent said they did this) and reading the news.

On tablets, the top five activities are browsing the Web in general, browsing for content tied to what they’re watching (just over 38 percent of tablet owners responded to this option), reading personal email, reading the news and social media. Interestingly, for 25-to-34-year-olds, the top activity on a tablet while also watching TV was browsing for TV-content-related information.

Even on smartphones, there’s a strong link. Not surprisingly, texting/messaging is the most common smartphone activity while also watching TV, followed by social media, general Web browsing, browsing for TV-content-related information (36 percent of respondents) and then reading personal email. Interestingly, texting about content on TV was actually the sixth-most-common activity on smartphones across all age groups, but was the second most common for 45-to-54-year-olds.

The key takeaway from all this is that nearly 40 percent of people surveyed are already making the effort to manually tie together what they’re watching on the big screen to the small screen in front of them. Imagine how much higher that percentage could go if there was some mechanism for connecting the devices automatically?

Of course, this is easier said than done. There’s no standardized method of transmitting what people are currently watching on their TVs to other devices, although audio analysis technologies (similar in concept to what Shazam does for music) can — in theory, at least — recognize what people are watching by listening to the audio content of the program.

Imagine how much higher that percentage could go if there was some mechanism for connecting the devices automatically.

Plus, these technologies can do so in a way that is independent of a show’s programmed time slot, and can compensate for DVR recordings, streaming from the Web, and other common forms of TV viewing. The problem is, these recognition technologies have been around for a long time — some quick Web searches pointed to initial efforts from almost 10 years ago — and none have found mainstream acceptance.

To my mind, this seems like a great big data/cloud analytics opportunity, so I have to presume work continues to evolve in this area. Even once you can accurately identify what people are watching, however, that still has to be translated into a range of Web-based “responses.”

At a simple level, taking people to a particular program’s website is a reasonable first step, but there is a whole range of rich opportunities for linking to related content, shopping opportunities and much more. Plus, with some additional intelligence, there would be an additional level of personalization that would be possible. In other words, if you and I were both watching the same program, we wouldn’t necessarily receive the same links for further browsing and exploration.

Like many of the technologies that I expect we’ll see at the upcoming 2016 CES, the concept of a smart, connected TV viewing experience isn’t new. However, that doesn’t mean there isn’t an opportunity to leverage the enormous range of devices and connectivity options now ubiquitous in homes around the world to drive a new set of experiences that consumers will truly appreciate. After all, in the tech business, timing is everything.


Bob O’Donnell is the founder and chief analyst of Technalysis Research LLC, a technology consulting and market research firm that provides strategic consulting and market research services to the technology industry and professional financial community. Reach him @bobodtech.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh