Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Elizabeth Warren choked during her first Daily Show interview. Here’s how Jon Stewart fixed it.

Comedy Central

As Jon Stewart announces his Daily Show departure, it’s easy to admire his epic takedowns of politicians and media personalities. But what also makes his show work so well are revealing, friendly interviews. A great example: the 2009 Daily Show appearance of a Harvard Law professor named Elizabeth Warren.

At the time, Warren was the chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel on TARP. She writes in her 2014 memoir that she was so nervous that she vomited repeatedly before she went on-air. And her nervousness shows — she hesitates before she answers, and she even forgets the name of a TARP program. In her memoir, Warren herself characterizes the first part of the interview as “terrible.”

She sort of recovers, but really she never seems to make a point. And Stewart knew it, too. Throughout the interview it seems like Stewart is fighting to get this anxious professor to tell him what’s really important. When that didn’t happen, he rearranged his show to give her more time. Warren writes:

"As I started to bolt out of my chair, Stewart grabbed my forearm and said something like, 'You wanted to deliver an important message here, and you didn't get to it. If I gave you one sentence, what would you tell people?'

We looked hard at each other again, our heads inches apart, and then I told him what I really thought. He said, 'Okay, hold on.'"

Stewart then argued with the stage director, insisting that Warren stay on after the break. “You don’t have much time,” he told her.

The rest of the interview takes off, and Warren seems to find her stride. She finally explains what she wanted to from the beginning: that she thinks deregulation was to blame for a new boom-and-bust cycle in the financial world.

“We go 50 years without a financial panic, without a crisis,” she says. “Then what happens? We say, ‘Regulation: it’s a pain, it’s expensive, we don’t need it.’ So we start pulling the threads out of the regulatory fabric. And what’s the first thing we get? The S&L crisis.”

Warren gives a strong defense of regulation, and Stewart relaxes. “That is the first time in six months to a year that I felt better. ... Thank you. That actually put things into perspective and made sense for me,” he tells her.

Of course, not everyone agrees with Stewart’s (or Warren’s) politics. But it’s a great illustration of why viewers kept coming back to his show — not only did he lay into the people he disagreed with, but he coaxed great, cogent, thoughtful answers out of his guests.

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North