Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Obama: ‘There’s No Scenario in Which We Don’t Want Really Strong Encryption’

Shouldn’t regular people be entitled keep their communications private, just like the president does, asked Kara Swisher?

Vjeran Pavic

The ongoing tussle over people’s data has pitted President Barack Obama and his administration against companies like Apple and Google, as both sides take up an increasingly crucial debate about the balance between privacy and protection.

These companies are among a number of tech giants that have pushed Washington to end the bulk collection of private data because of customer privacy concerns, while the NSA has said the practice is necessary to fighting terrorism.

As part of a one-on-one interview with Re/code on a wide range of technology topics, Kara Swisher* asked the president whether American citizens should be entitled to control their data, just as the president controls his own private conversations through encrypted email. It’s an issue that’s increasingly important as people move their conversations and payments to newer, more secure alternatives on mobile phones.

“You have encrypted email, shouldn’t everybody have encrypted email, or have their protections?” she asked.

Obama replied that he’s “a strong believer in strong encryption …. I lean probably further on side of strong encryption than some in law enforcement.” He maintained that he is as firm on the topic as he ever has been.

But the issue, Obama said, is the hypothetical. What if the FBI has a good case against someone involved in a terrorist plot and wants to know who that person was communicating with? Traditionally, they could get a court order for a wire tap. Today, a company might tell the FBI they can’t technically comply.

That’s not to say Obama would point specifically to a case where encryption stymied an investigation. “The first time that an attack takes place in which it turns out that we had a lead and we couldn’t follow up on it, the public’s going to demand answers,” he said.

Obama didn’t offer any proposals, but he staked his own position. “Ultimately everybody, and certainly this is true for me and my family, we all want to know that if we’re using a smartphone for transactions, sending messages, having private conversations, that we don’t have a bunch of people compromising that process. There’s no scenario in which we don’t want really strong encryption.”

Sensitive to Silicon Valley concerns about government eavesdropping, Obama added, “This isn’t bulk collection. This isn’t fishing expeditions by government.”

* Kara Swisher is married to but separated from Megan Smith, chief technology officer for the Obama Administration. See her ethics statement here.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh