Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Twitter Oscar Numbers Drop, but TV Ratings Sink Much Lower

Nielsen says Twitter’s Oscar numbers dropped last night -- but TV’s dropped more.

Screenshot via ABC/Oscar.go.com
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

You’re going to see a few sets of numbers about Twitter’s performance during the 2015 Oscars. Here is the first: Nielsen says that 13 million U.S. Twitter users checked out last night’s show. That’s down from 13.9 million last year — a drop of 6.5 percent.

If you are a Twitter fan or a Twitter executive, you will point to that drop as a victory. That’s because the American TV audience for last night’s snoozer looks to have dropped by 16 percent, and it hit a six-year low.

Translation: People who use Twitter are much more likely to watch the Oscars than the rest of America. Which makes sense, since watching the Oscars, and making fun of them, or complaining about them, or simply wondering WTF is up with John Travolta, is kind of the point of Twitter. Or at least one of its main points.

This is what Twitter executives have been saying for years, in various ways. That message has morphed over time — at one point Twitter was trying to argue that it could drive ratings to TV shows, but now it has a fuzzier message about “engagement” — but Twitter hearts TV does seem to have some resonance.

Facebook, which ignored “social TV” for years, has recently made its own push, and has its own numbers to announce from last night: It says 21 million people worldwide had 58 million “interactions” with Oscar-related stuff, which means they liked a post, or commented on one, or wrote one.

That’s up from 11.3 million and 25.4 million last year, and that leap isn’t that surprising given the focus Facebook put on this year’s show, which included live streaming video from backstage. Sources say Facebook offered up to $2 million in “in-kind” promotion to ABC, which broadcast the awards, to seal that deal.

You want more numbers? You’ll get more numbers: Twitter plans to release its own metrics, which will show the event’s global “reach.” That will include people who used Twitter during the awards, as well as “logged out” viewers who saw tweets on Twitter’s website or in other venues.

That is likely to produce a very, very big number, which is Twitter’s point, since it has been trying to argue that Twitter’s “real” audience is much bigger than its 288 million monthly active users.

Last year, for instance, Twitter said that the Oscars generated 3.3 billion impressions, a bunch of which came from the famous Ellen selfie.

There was no equivalent moment last night — in part because John Travolta creeped out people in a series of encounters, not a single event. Also perhaps because people like to look at happy celebrities instead of creeped-out ones.

So last night’s number may not climb that high. But Twitter will want to see a big result, regardless.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh