Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The health insurance deductibles are too damn high, in one chart

(Shutterstock)

We have ample evidence that health-care costs are increasingly shifting away from employers and onto employees. Deductibles — the amount an enrollee has to pay before the insurer will cover medical bills — have risen sharply over the past decade. Even after adjusting for inflation, one recent analysis finds deductibles have doubled from $1,240 for family coverage in 2002 up to $2,491 in 2013.

A new Kaiser Family Foundation study explores one big repercussion of that trend: lots of American families wouldn’t have enough cash on hand to cover the average deductible.

The KFF study looked at the liquid assets of American families — things like savings accounts, mutual fund investments, savings bonds, and other things that could quickly be converted into cash— and compared them to different deductible sizes that turn up in today’s insurance market.

The key takeaway is there are lots of families that wouldn’t be able to afford these types of deductibles. KFF finds that 37 percent of American families don’t have more liquid assets than a medium-range deductible ($1,200 for individual coverage, $2,400 for family) and 49 percent couldn’t cover a higher-range deductible ($2,500 for an individual, $5,000 for a family).

Of course, there are lots of insurance subscribers who never meet their deductible. But for those who have more medical needs, the KFF research suggests that their coverage might offer scant financial protection.

“Deductibles may provide a sensible incentive for people to be prudent consumers of health care,” KFF president Drew Altman writes. “But with so many people with private coverage lacking the funds to meet growing cost-sharing obligations, they can pose a serious financial burden and sometimes be a barrier to care for many, especially lower- and moderate-wage workers.”

More in Health Care

Politics
Mifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for nowMifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for now
Politics

Only Thomas and Alito publicly dissented.

By Ian Millhiser
Health
Hantavirus will test if the world learned anything from CovidHantavirus will test if the world learned anything from Covid
Health

The hantavirus outbreak is still small. But it’s a huge test for a battered public health sector.

By Dylan Scott
Health
How worried should I be about hantavirus?How worried should I be about hantavirus?
Health

5 questions about the hantavirus cruise ship outbreak, answered.

By Dylan Scott
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Health
A major new study found AI outperformed doctors in ER diagnosis — but there’s a catchA major new study found AI outperformed doctors in ER diagnosis — but there’s a catch
Health

An Open AI model posted impressive results in emergency care. But we still need human doctors.

By Dylan Scott
Health
Please don’t inject yourself with bootleg peptidesPlease don’t inject yourself with bootleg peptides
Health

Why Americans have gone wild self-experimenting with the hottest thing in wellness: Peptides.

By Dylan Scott