Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Snapchat’s Discover Publishers Are Asking for Big Ad Rates -- And They’re Getting Them

Advertisers are paying big for Snapchat. Because teens.

Snapchat’s Discover platform is one of the hottest properties in media. That’s why Snapchat and its publishing partners are asking for very high prices for ads that run on Discover — and why marketers are paying them.

Industry sources say Discover ad pricing is running around $100 for every thousand views — a rate that’s something like twice what a premium video publisher can get, and many times what a mere Web publisher can command. Perhaps that’s why Alibaba felt comfortable putting $200 million into Snapchat, at a reported $15 billion valuation.

Snapchat launched Discover in late January. It’s a new section of the app where users can watch videos or read stories from a dozen different publishers like CNN, Vice or ESPN.

Snapchat publishers set their own rates and provide a guaranteed view count to ad buyers based on traffic patterns they’ve established in the last few weeks. Industry sources say that on average, publishers are getting around 10 cents a view for their ads, which are seen anywhere from 500,000 times a day to a million times a day. That means publishers are able to command $50,000 to $100,000 a day for their stuff.

The publishers and Snapchat split the revenue differently depending on who sells the ad. If a publisher sells the ad space, they get 70 percent of the revenue; if Snapchat sells the ad, the revenue is split evenly.

Publishers can also bundle the Snapchat buys with inventory on other platforms if they sell it themselves; sources say ESPN’s sales force is taking this tactic, and has been able to sell Discover ads for more than $100,000 a day.

Since Discover is brand-new — Snapchat itself is only four years old — a lot of this pricing and ad buying is experimental. And prices usually run high in the early days of new properties, while publishers and marketers identify a proper balance.

There’s also a bit of a safety net for marketers to give it a try, too. If the publisher gets fewer views than they guaranteed to the marketer — which has been happening regularly, according to one source — then publishers will run the ads for longer than the 24-hour window until that view total is hit.

And in any case, a big part of the Snapchat pitch goes beyond raw view totals. Publishers believe they’re reaching teens and millennials they’re having a hard time reaching elsewhere, which is why they’re okay putting their stuff on a platform that doesn’t link to their own websites and apps — meaning they can’t create referral traffic.

That being said, we had trouble finding many ads within Discover this week. One source says that this has been standard — sometimes they’re there, sometimes they aren’t, especially in these early days.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh