Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Judge Gives Preliminary Approval to $415 Million Settlement in No-Poaching Suit

A judge approved a settlement amount in the suit against Apple, Google, Adobe Systems and Intel.

Reuters / Aly Song

A judge has tentatively approved a $415 million settlement in a class action suit brought by workers who accused some of Silicon Valley’s best-known companies, including Apple and Google, of conspiring to avoid poaching one another’s employees.

Federal District Court Judge Lucy Koh, who had earlier rejected a lower settlement offer, determined that the more lucrative proposal was, “sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate” to compensate potentially thousands of the salaried employees who worked for these companies from 2005 to 2009.

The suit, filed in 2011, alleged that Apple, Google, Adobe Systems and Intel kept a lid on salaries and reduced job mobility by agreeing not to recruit one another’s employees.

Three other companies that were originally named in the complaint — Lucasfilm, Pixar and Intuit — opted to settle in 2013 for $20 million.

A final hearing on the settlement amount will be held on July 9. All of the companies involved in the proposed settlement said the offer does not constitute an admission of guilt.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady