Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

FCC Boss Wheeler Tells Broadcasters Net Neutrality Is Good for Them

The new rules protect broadcasters from discrimination in reaching an online audience, Wheeler tells conference.

Super Mobility Week/CTIA

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler used the platform of the National Association of Broadcasters show to launch a spirited defense of the new Open Internet rules, even as lawsuits challenging the order pile up in Washington, D.C.

Wheeler sought to build support among the nation’s radio and television broadcasters, arguing that the net neutrality regulations the commission adopted in February will ensure that no one stands in the way of audiences accessing the content they deliver via the Internet.

“The Open Internet order safeguards an increasingly important distribution channel for your most important product — local news and information,” Wheeler said Wednesday in Las Vegas. “It assures that your use of the Internet will be free from the risk of discrimination or hold-up by a gatekeeper.”

Wheeler portrayed the FCC’s net neutrality rules as the 21st century equivalent of the so-called must-carry rules, which require cable television providers in a particular market to carry the signals of local TV stations.

The National Cable & Telecommunications Association, the United States Telecom Association and the CTIA this week all filed lawsuits seeking to overturn the FCC’s net neutrality order. The trade groups are challenging the decision to treat broadband providers like a regulated utility.

The FCC is relying on legal authority Congress granted it under Title II of the Communications Act to impose new rules that forbid both wired and wireless Internet providers from blocking or slowing Internet traffic.

The lawsuits, filed this week, allege the FCC’s actions are “arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh