Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Apple’s New Music Service Will Push Paid Subscriptions, With Free Samples

Coming soon from Jimmy Iovine: The anti-Spotify service.

Asa Mathat

Apple wants people to pay for its streaming music service. But that doesn’t mean it won’t let people listen for free, too.

Apple is still negotiating deals for the streaming service, which it would like to announce soon. But it would like to offer several ways to let people listen to some music without paying, according to industry sources. Those include:

  • A free trial period, which may range from one to three months, depending on the outcome of Apple’s negotiations with music labels.
  • A feature that will let music owners upload a sampling of songs that users could listen to without subscribing to the service. Several sources describe this feature as something akin to SoundCloud, the music streaming service that describes itself as the “YouTube for audio.”
  • A new version of Apple’s iTunes Radio, featuring stations programmed by human beings instead of computers, which could be localized for different countries. Apple hired popular BBC Radio 1 DJ Zane Lowe this spring and has subsequently wooed four top producers from the station, Music Business Worldwide reported.

But as we have previously reported, Apple doesn’t intend to provide free, unlimited on-demand streaming, as competitors Spotify and YouTube do. In private meetings with label executives and other music industry figures, Apple has been arguing that free streaming won’t generate enough money for the industry via advertising, and doesn’t give enough people incentive to pay for subscriptions.

That stance syncs up with public comments made over the last six months by the industry’s three big music labels; it has also triggered preliminary investigations by the European Commission and the Federal Trade Commission in the U.S. Sources say the FTC is looking at whether Apple is using its position as the largest seller of music downloads to put rival music services like Spotify at a disadvantage.

Under former CEO Steve Jobs, Apple ignored the streaming music market and focused on the sales of music downloads, via its iTunes store. But last May current CEO Tim Cook telegraphed his plans to change direction on music, by spending $3 billion to acquire Beats Electronics and Beats Music, a subscription service that launched a few months earlier.

The acquisition brought Beats co-founder and veteran label head Jimmy Iovine to Apple. He has served as its colorful front-man in seeking support from the labels, artist managers and music publishers, working alongside the traditional iTunes music team.

The company has promised a thunderous marketing campaign to promote the benefits of a subscription music service to the 800 million people who have iTunes accounts. That may benefit other services as well, including competitor Spotify, which recently completed a $350 million funding round that values the streaming service at $8 billion.

Apple declined to comment on either the details of its new service or any regulatory inquiries.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh