Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

What we know about the attack on Dallas police headquarters

  1. Around 12:30 am Saturday, according to police, at least one suspect opened fire on police officers outside the headquarters of the Dallas Police Department.
  2. Police also said they discovered two packages outside the headquarters that had been rigged to explode, including one with a pipe bomb. One package exploded when a controlled-detonation robot picked it up.
  3. No officers were injured.
  4. The suspect was killed during a standoff with police officers after he attempted to escape in an armored van.
  5. Police officers say the suspect identified himself as James Boulware, but they have not yet confirmed his identity.

This article will continue to be updated as new information comes in.

What we know

According to police, analysis of the attack on the police department shows that one gunman attempted to attack police from multiple locations outside the department. Initial reports had said there were multiple gunmen (as many as four), but as of a press conference on Saturday morning, police believed only one suspect was responsible. Dallas Police Chief David O. Brown said on Saturday the attack appeared to be a deliberate attempt to target and kill police officers, based on the locations of the shots.

The suspect fled the scene in what police described as an “armored van,” hitting a squad car. Police chased the van. They were able to corner the van and shoot out its engine in a nearby suburb, prompting a standoff.

According to police, the suspect was a white man who identified himself as James Boulware. The suspect blamed police for his losing custody of his son, and said police thought he was a terrorist.

After the suspect stopped responding to police, police shot into the vehicle. Several hours later, they were able to confirm they'd killed him. The police then detonated the van, which, as the suspect had warned, contained additional bombs.

A man named James Boulware in the area has a history of threats and domestic violence. After one incident in 2013, family members reported that Boulware had been talking about shooting up churches and schools, and police confiscated a cache of guns and ammunition from Boulware’s house.

It’s rare for police to be deliberately injured or killed on the job

Individual attacks on police get a lot of attention — even when police aren't killed, as in Dallas. And in general, assaults on police are not uncommon: In 2013, the assault rate was 9.3 for every 100 officers (it's been on the decline since 1998). But fewer than 30 percent of assaults result in an injury to the officer. And it's even more rare for officers to be killed in attacks.

Over the past 20 years, an average of 55 police officers a year have been killed by a criminal. Generally, more police deaths are the result of an accident than of a deliberate action. Since 2000, for example, accidental killings make up 56 percent of all deaths on the job.

However, ambushes like this one — unprovoked attacks on police — are actually the second-most-common circumstance for police to be killed over the past 10 years for which data is available. From 2004 to 2013, 111 officers were killed in ambushes.

What we don’t know

We don’t know for sure that the suspect was in fact named James Boulware, or if he was the same James Boulware who had a previous history of threats. The Dallas Police Department cautioned that the suspect might have given cops a false name, and they haven’t yet confirmed his identity.

We don’t know whether the suspect acted alone. As of Saturday morning, police believed he was the only gunman at the scene. But they didn’t have any information about whether he had assistance in building the bombs or planning the attack.

Policy
Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?
Policy

The DOJ used to avoid spectacles like the Louise Lucas raid.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
What the Supreme Court still has left to decide this termWhat the Supreme Court still has left to decide this term
Politics

Democracy and Donald Trump dominate the Court’s remaining docket.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phoneThe Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone
Politics

The justices were concerned that the Trump administration is asking for too much in a major police surveillance case.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady