Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Snapchat Is Making Some Pretty Serious Money From Live Stories

Ads for Snapchat’s Live Stories feature are going for hundreds of thousands of dollars a day.

Asa Mathat for Re/code

Snapchat built a brand out of disappearing photos, but now it’s building a business from content that has a little more staying power.

It has been almost exactly a year since the messaging startup first introduced Live Stories, the photo and video montages that serve as look-ins on live events like the Kentucky Derby or Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign rally. And in the past six months, Snapchat has beefed up the team that curates these stories while prepping for more advertising partners to coincide with the 2016 presidential campaigns.

A big reason for the push for ad revenue is to justify the company’s reported $16 billion valuation. Investors are betting big that Snapchat will be able to book $1 billion in yearly sales. So far, the popularity of Live Stories — among both advertisers and users — suggests it could be one of the best ways for the company to reach that goal.

Ben Schwerin, Snapchat’s director of partnerships, told Re/code that, on average, Snapchat’s Live Stories draw an audience of 20 million people in a 24-hour window. The three-day Live Story Snapchat did around Coachella back in April generated 40 million unique viewers, he said.

From a business standpoint, Live Stories are generating some good money for the company, too. Schwerin declined to discuss ad prices, but sources familiar with the business say Snapchat charges around two cents per view on a 10-second ad inserted alongside user submitted content — a rate very similar to what Snapchat charges for its Discover ads.

The rates change slightly depending on the specific event and expected audience, but two cents per view equates to $400,000 worth of ad space for a story generating 20 million views.

That can be a lot of money for one advertiser to fork over for a 24-hour ad. But Snapchat also sells the ad spots in the same story to multiple sponsors if needed. Each story has four ad spots, and the price for each spot changes depending on where it’s placed. Spots near the beginning of the story go for more money as they’re more likely to be seen.

Snapchat used to highlight just one or two live events per week in January. Now, the company features multiple events per day. The company has grown its team of Live Story curators from fewer than 10 people to more than 40 people in that time, according to Schwerin.

The model appears to be working. Snapchat eliminated its original ad unit, Brand Stories, earlier this year, but Schwerin expects the Live Stories business to keep growing. “It’s still a relatively new product and we’ve been focused on content [so far] but I think you’re going to see a lot more ads in the future,” he said.

Sponsorship opportunities actually play a big role in which events Snapchat chooses to cover. Sometimes Snapchat will commit to doing a story first and look for an advertiser after. This was the case on Wednesday when Activision sponsored Snapchat’s E3 Live Story, touting its new Call of Duty game.

In other cases, an advertisers will pitch an event they’d like to sponsor, prompting Snapchat to set it up, said Schwerin.

In addition to Live Stories, Snapchat has a section of the app called Discover for publishers like CNN and ESPN to showcase short videos and stories each day. Ads are sold alongside the content.

Those ads were crazy expensive when they first launched, and have since returned to more competitive levels. Schwerin said Snapchat plans to continue expanding the Live Stories feature, especially around politics and what he called “local stories,” or events that will only be visible to people in a specific geographic area. (Snapchat is already running a few of these.)

With a polarizing subject like politics, Snapchat could easily turn off parts of its user base depending on how stories are presented. This is why Snapchat has been hiring journalists for its curation team, including longtime CNN political reporter Peter Hamby, who has been attending events in person to get a better feel for how the story should come together. Hamby even posts his own snaps to the story to add context and explain what’s happening.

“We want people to learn about this [political] process, to demystify it a bit,” Schwerin said. “Why are people going to Iowa? Not a lot of young people know that.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh