Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

FireEye Identifies Chinese Group Behind Federal Hack

It’s not the one you may have heard about.

jrwasserman / Thinkstock

Computer security firm FireEye has identified a Chinese group that may have carried out a devastating hacking attack against the U.S. Office of Personnel Management last year, leading to the theft of information on millions of federal employees and retirees. The hack was first disclosed earlier this month.

The group, based in China, is not the one known as “Deep Panda” that has been tied to the Chinese military and an attack on insurer Anthem Health earlier this year. It is instead another group whose activities FireEye has monitored since 2013 and that specializes in attacks that are meant to gather troves of personally identifiable information, or PII. The group focuses its attention and efforts on the health insurance and travel industries. FireEye did not assign a name to the group.

“Unlike other actors operating in China who conduct industrial espionage or steal defense technology, this group has primarily targeted PII. Based on the tools and tactics, FireEye Intelligence thinks that the group who compromised OPM’s networks is different from the activity of Deep Panda.

“We think this group uses similar backdoors to Deep Panda to obtain access to a network, but then uses different tactics once they get access to the network,” said Mike Oppenheim, an intelligence operations manager for FireEye, in an interview with Re/code.

Laura Galante, FireEye’s director of threat intelligence, said the group is believed to be operating out of China, but it’s unclear what direction it may receive from government agencies. “That is an open question and we haven’t worked it out at this point,” she said.

The FBI has not yet publicly identified the culprit behind the attacks, but members of Congress — including Sen. Harry Reid, who receives briefings on sensitive intelligence matters — have mentioned on the Senate floor a Chinese role in the OPM attack.

The Chinese government has denied any connection to the attack. “The Chinese government takes resolute strong measures against any kind of hacking attack,” China’s Foreign Ministry told Reuters. “We oppose baseless insinuations against China.”

The FBI announced that it was investigating the attack on the OPM on June 4. Initial estimates said that information on more than four million people was stolen. A union representing federal workers said in a letter on June 11 that it believed information on many more people may be involved.

Deep Panda was so named by the security firm Crowdstrike.

Security firms and researchers often reach differing conclusions on the perpetrators of high-profile hacking attacks, and they often release conflicting reports. For example, some security firms dispute an FBI finding that hackers linked to North Korea carried out the attack on Sony Pictures Entertainment last year.

Correction: We previously misidentified Laura Galante as a FireEye spokeswoman. Also Crowdstrike didn’t implicate Deep Panda in the OPM attack, but it did give the group its name.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh