Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

All Aboard! Indie Labels Agree to Apple Music’s New Terms. What About Taylor?

Apple Music launches next Tuesday. Now it has just about everyone it needs signed up ...

Instagram
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Independent labels that had complained about Apple’s plans for its upcoming music subscription service have changed their minds, because Apple has changed its terms.

Which means the biggest remaining question before the Apple Music launch on Tuesday is whether Taylor Swift will be on board.

Impala, the European trade group for indie labels, and Beggars Group, one of the most prominent indies, have announced that they’re happy with Apple’s new terms.

Indies had complained about Apple’s original plan, which wouldn’t have generated any revenue for them or any other music rights holders during Apple Music’s free three-month trial period; Apple backed down from that plan on Sunday after labels, and eventually Taylor Swift, complained.

“Apple has made a decision to pay for all usage of Apple Music under the free trials on a per-play basis, as well as to modify a number of other terms and issues raised by independent labels,” Impala said in a statement.

And here’s Beggars’ statement: “Over the last few days we have had increasingly fruitful discussions with Apple. We are now delighted to say that we are happy to endorse the deal with Apple Music as it now stands, and look forward to being a big part of a very exciting future.”

The announcements wipe out most of the uncertainty ahead of Apple’s subscription service launch. But Taylor Swift, whose open letter to Apple pushed the company to capitulate, hasn’t said yet if she is on board.

Swift had previously said she wouldn’t allow “1989,” the album she released last fall, on Apple Music because of its free trial terms. On Sunday Swift tweeted that she was “elated and relieved” that Apple had changed course, but has yet to formally announce if she’s changed her mind. Swift’s back catalog, though, will be available on Apple Music.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh