Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Can Facebook Win With Messenger?

Removing the need to maintain an actual Facebook presence might be just the thing to get you to stop using four different messaging apps at once.

Facebook

In a semi-surprising bit of social news, Mark Zuckerberg and company have officially removed the requirement that users of its Messenger app sign up using their Facebook login credentials. At first glance, it seems like a small, relatively innocuous policy change, but if you take a minute to think about it, it just might be the most revolutionary and forward-thinking thing the company has ever done.

It might seem like a few years have gone by, but Messenger has only been officially decoupled from Facebook proper since last April. In the last year, Messenger has shown explosive growth — from 200 million to over 700 million monthly active users. Why change now? Why fix what clearly isn’t broken?

The answer is as simple as it is brilliant: Almost everyone who wants to use Facebook is already using it, so rather than take no for an answer, Facebook is going after the skeptics.

The cool kids

Every few months, we see a new report and a resulting smattering of articles with headlines like “Facebook ‘Not Hip’ Say Youngsters.” The latest study, done by Frank N. Magid Associates Inc., noted that only 88 percent of U.S. 13-to-17-year-olds use it, down from 95 percent just a few years ago. Where did they go? Certainly not to Twitter, where the numbers are even more dismal. They’re mostly using chat applications like Snapchat, Kik and (Facebook-owned) WhatsApp.

If 88 percent of your friends are using Facebook (and Messenger) anyway, removing the need to maintain an actual Facebook presence might be just the thing to get you to stop using four different messaging apps at once.

The privacy people

Since the very moment it became the dominant social network, there has been a small but devoted group of people who have refused all of Facebook’s advances. Under the pretext of privacy concerns, these are the people who take to Twitter to lambast the company for the most minor of TOS changes, the people who championed Ello for a little too long, the people who posted a copyright notice to their Instagram accounts before abandoning the service entirely.

Taking away the need for all that personally identifiable info might counter all those privacy objections, especially once all of your other friends have given up the fight.

The SMS-dependent

It’s sometimes hard to believe, but there are places in the world where Facebook has never really gotten a foothold. Some markets have homegrown alternatives (VK, Sina Weibo, etc.) while others still rely on the aging SMS protocol for real-time communication. For international users with limited service plans, texting can quickly become prohibitively expensive.

A free service that allows you to communicate with anyone, virtually anywhere in the world, is a fantastic introduction to Facebook for people who haven’t yet had the opportunity to use it.


Carmen Sutter is a product manager for Adobe Social, focusing on data collection and campaigns. In her role, Sutter is responsible for the social-monitoring functionality as well as the integration of Adobe Analytics and Adobe Social. She is a board member of the Big Boulder Initiative, the world’s first social-data-focused industry association. Prior to joining Adobe, she led the digital analytics teams at Warner Music Group and Scholastic in New York City. Reach her @c_sutter.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh