Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Hillary Clinton laces up her partisan boxing gloves for economy speech

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton holds up a pair of boxing gloves given to her by a union leader on October 31, 2007, in Washington, DC.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton holds up a pair of boxing gloves given to her by a union leader on October 31, 2007, in Washington, DC.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton holds up a pair of boxing gloves given to her by a union leader on October 31, 2007, in Washington, DC.
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Hillary Clinton will hammer Republicans when she outlines her economic vision for America on Monday.

In particular, she’ll go after Republicans, including Jeb Bush and Chris Christie, who have framed their economic plans around a hard-to-achieve 4 percent annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate rather than building a system that is both more fair to all Americans and geared for sustainable growth, according to her campaign.

“The measure of our economic success should be how much incomes rise for middle-class households, not an arbitrary growth figure,” a Clinton campaign official said. “She firmly believes that yes, we have to grow. But we have to grow together — meaning we should pursue a rise in GDP through strategies that will ensure middle-class incomes grow alongside corporate profits and executive compensation. That’s the key.”

The basic argument, according to the campaign: Republicans aren’t offering anything different from the trickle-down theory of the Reagan era, which posited that aiming benefits to the wealthiest in America would goose the economy and lift the middle and lower classes. Clinton will make the case that helping the middle class will spur growth.

Her own plans — mostly standard Democratic fare — probably won’t thrill the Bernie Sanders crowd. But they should create enough of a contrast with leading Republicans to assure most Democratic voters that she’s clearly left of center.

She’ll propose raising taxes on wealthy investors, boosting wages for low-income workers, and invest public and private money in infrastructure and jobs of the future, according to a release from her campaign. It’s likely that Clinton will hold back a few wrinkles as surprises for Monday’s speech at the New School in New York City.

The speech is designed to build the framework for policies she will detail more fully in a series of announcements over the summer. The campaign broke it down into three major pillars:

  1. Increase private/public investment and unleash workforce participation
  2. Reward work more fairly to reduce inequality
  3. Encourage long-term thinking and more sustainable business strategies

Under the first category, Clinton will propose directing federal and private investments to an infrastructure bank and clean energy jobs and reiterate her support for policies that provide for child care, paid leave, and paid sick days as an important component of strengthening the workforce.

She’ll also argue that a high concentration of wealth retards economic growth as an explanation for a series of proposals aimed at raising revenue from the richest Americans and providing benefits to laborers. The list includes raising the minimum wage, backing collective bargaining rights for workers, increasing taxes on the wealthiest Americans, and cutting health-care costs.

To the chagrin of Democratic interest groups, Clinton is unlikely to put a lot of flesh on the bone in Monday’s speech, preferring to roll out detailed policies at a slower pace in the coming months.

But with the final top-tier Republican contender — Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker — getting into the race later Monday, Clinton is clearly most interested in ensuring she’s contrasting her theory of economic success with that of the GOP.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters