Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Filmmaker Laura Poitras has been detained 50 times. Now she’s suing to find out why.

Laura Poitras poses for a portrait at the 30th Film Independent Spirit Awards on February 21, 2015. She won Best Documentary for Citizenfour, her film about Ed Snowden.
Laura Poitras poses for a portrait at the 30th Film Independent Spirit Awards on February 21, 2015. She won Best Documentary for Citizenfour, her film about Ed Snowden.
Laura Poitras poses for a portrait at the 30th Film Independent Spirit Awards on February 21, 2015. She won Best Documentary for Citizenfour, her film about Ed Snowden.
Smallz & Raskind/Getty Images

Laura Poitras is one of the most celebrated documentary filmmakers of our age. Her work has earned her a MacArthur Foundation “genius grant,” a Pulitzer Prize, and an Academy Award. In 2013, she helped National Security Agency whistleblower Ed Snowden release classified documents to journalists.

And between 2006 and 2012, Poitras, an American citizen, was detained and questioned at airports more than 50 times. The US government has refused to explain why. So now she’s suing the government to release documents related to these detentions.

Many of Poitras’s detentions were much more intrusive than the “enhanced” pat-downs ordinary travelers endure at airports. On one occasion, Poitras says that her laptop, video camera, and cellphone were seized for 41 days. She would be taken to off-site locations and questioned for more than an hour. On some trips, she would be detained once before boarding a plane and then a second time upon her arrival. She says she was detained on every international trip she took between July 2006 and April 2012.

It’s not hard to figure out why the government is interested in Poitras. Her journalism has consistently focused on topics that make America’s national security establishment uncomfortable. She had made a 2006 film about the American occupation of Iraq and a 2010 film about two men with ties to al-Qaeda. She met with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange during work on a film about the US state surveillance. During her work on these films, she undoubtedly talked to many people who are of interest to US authorities.

On the other hand, the United States is supposed to be a nation that protects freedom of the press and the rule of law. In most circumstances, the Fourth Amendment prevents the government from arbitrarily searching or detaining journalists or members of the general public. If an American police officer pulled over Poitras in her car, detained her for questioning, and seized all of the files on her laptop, she’d be able to challenge it as a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

But the courts have effectively stripped Americans of Fourth Amendment protections at airports and international borders. In these places, the authorities have broad latitude to detain, search, and question travelers.

Poitras’s lawsuit isn’t challenging the constitutionality of her many detentions. She’s seeking something more basic: information. Over the past two years, she has submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to nine government agencies seeking documents related to her detention. The agencies have ignored her requests, claimed not to have any relevant documents, or refused to hand them over. So now she’s suing for their release.

“I’m filing this lawsuit because the government uses the U.S. border to bypass the rule of law,” Poitras said on Monday. “This simply should not be tolerated in a democracy. I am also filing this suit in support of the countless other less high-profile people who have also been subjected to years of Kafkaesque harassment at the borders. We have a right to know how this system works and why we are targeted.”

More in Politics

Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz
Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp