Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Samsung Scrapes to Victory in Proxy Battle Over $8 Billion Merger

Though it fell short, the dustup is expected to affect other family conglomerates, which dominate Korea’s economy.

Samsung

Samsung Group’s founding family on Friday scored a narrow win in a landmark proxy battle, fending off an activist investor opposed to an $8 billion deal that cements its grip as a new generation prepares to take the reins of South Korea’s biggest conglomerate.

At an often-heated shareholder meeting, investors in builder Samsung C&T Corp approved an all-share takeover offer from sister firm Cheil Industries, Samsung’s de facto holding company — but only just. With the backing of two-thirds of votes cast needed for success, some 69.53 percent of shares voted to support the tie-up.

U.S. hedge fund Elliott Associates, with a 7.1 percent Samsung C&T stake, had led the charge against the deal, saying it undervalued the target. That view was shared by an impassioned group of domestic retail investors, who saw a merger that bolsters the Lee family’s control of Samsung Electronics as riding roughshod over minority interests.

“While the deal will boost Samsung’s restructuring, Samsung lost the faith of a lot of foreign and minority shareholders,” said Kang Dong-oh, a proxy representative for an online forum of minority shareholders against the merger.

Each of the two firms has stakes in key Samsung companies, including flagship tech giant Samsung Electronics. With 73-year-old group patriarch Lee Kun-hee hospitalized following a heart attack last year, the C&T-Cheil merger consolidates holdings into one entity firmly under the control of 47-year-old heir-apparent Jay Y. Lee and his two sisters.

Investors and analysts predict the Lees may now attempt to further consolidate control of Samsung Electronics by having it acquire IT services firm Samsung SDS Co Ltd, or even by splitting Samsung Electronics into an operating company and a holding company through which they can exert control.

Samsung has promised post-deal measures including higher dividends and a governance committee. “We will listen to those who opposed the deal and pledge to better engage with our shareholders and be more open to their input and feedback,” C&T and Cheil said in a joint statement.

“Scary Shareholders”

Even though it fell short on Friday, Elliott’s campaign is expected to compel other family conglomerates, or “chaebols,” which dominate the Korean economy, to be more mindful of minority investors. South Korean stocks often trade at discounts to global peers due to opaque shareholding structures and low dividends.

“The chaebols won’t be able to simply have their way anymore. They have probably all realized now how scary shareholders and the market can be,” said Park Jung-hoon, fund manager at HDC Asset Management.

During the spat, Elliott filed for two injunctions to stop the vote taking place. With a stake of more than 2 percent in the merged entity, deal-watchers expect it to continue challenging Samsung with lawsuits.

“Elliott is disappointed that the takeover appears to have been approved against the wishes of so many independent shareholders and reserves all options at its disposal,” the fund said in a statement.

Turnout for the vote was high, with 83.57 percent of eligible votes cast. Roughly 1,000 people crowded a conference hall and three overflow rooms reserved for the meeting in southern Seoul.

C&T’s biggest shareholder, South Korea’s National Pension Service (NPS), cast its 11.2 percent voting stake in favor of the deal, said a person with direct knowledge of the matter, providing decisive support for Samsung.

The NPS made its decision without consulting an external committee that it sometimes calls upon for difficult votes — and which often votes against company management. The committee on Friday made a rare statement saying it was regrettable that it was not consulted.

The pension fund declined to comment.

(By Joyce Lee and Sohee Kim; Additional reporting and writing by Se Young Lee; Editing by Kenneth Maxwell and Tony Munroe)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh