Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A new study reveals something important about obesity and health costs

A new paper in the journal PharmacoEconomics estimates that obesity is costing the US $315 billion in health-care costs alone. But those costs aren’t distributed the way people normally think.

As physician Aaron Carroll writes, the way we talk about obesity suggests that “if everyone in the US would just lose a little weight, we’d save massive money.” This paper shows that’s not true. Rather, “the relationship of medical care costs over BMI [body mass index] is J-shaped” — which is to say, the costs are concentrated in the small percentage of the population that’s most obese.

To put this in dollar terms, someone with a BMI of 30 who loses 5 percent of her bodyweight will save $69 in health-care costs each year. Someone with a BMI of 35 who loses 5 percent of his bodyweight will save $528. Someone with a BMI of 40 who loses 5 percent of her bodyweight will save $2,137.

Technically, all these people are obese. But so far as health-care spending goes, not all obesity is equal, or even close to it.

“If our goal is to reduce the cost to the US for obesity, we should likely focus on that small group of people, who are also likely the hardest to reach and influence,” writes Carroll. “Trying to get lots of people who have a BMI of 30-35 to lose some weight might make them feel better, but won’t influence health care spending in the US much at all.”

This is a principle that recurs often in health care: A massive amount of the costs are concentrated in a very small fraction of the population. In Medicare, for instance, 5 percent of the patients account for 50 percent of the costs.

More in Health Care

Politics
Mifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for nowMifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for now
Politics

Only Thomas and Alito publicly dissented.

By Ian Millhiser
Health
Hantavirus will test if the world learned anything from CovidHantavirus will test if the world learned anything from Covid
Health

The hantavirus outbreak is still small. But it’s a huge test for a battered public health sector.

By Dylan Scott
Health
How worried should I be about hantavirus?How worried should I be about hantavirus?
Health

5 questions about the hantavirus cruise ship outbreak, answered.

By Dylan Scott
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Health
A major new study found AI outperformed doctors in ER diagnosis — but there’s a catchA major new study found AI outperformed doctors in ER diagnosis — but there’s a catch
Health

An Open AI model posted impressive results in emergency care. But we still need human doctors.

By Dylan Scott
Health
Please don’t inject yourself with bootleg peptidesPlease don’t inject yourself with bootleg peptides
Health

Why Americans have gone wild self-experimenting with the hottest thing in wellness: Peptides.

By Dylan Scott